UN food agency criticized for not revising livestock emissions report

More than 20 scientists expressed frustration with the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization for not correcting errors in a livestock emissions report, which two cited academics say underestimates the impact of dietary changes on greenhouse gas reduction.

Arthur Neslen reports for The Guardian.

In short:

• Scientists argue that the Food and Agriculture Organization’s livestock emissions report contains multiple inaccuracies, which could mislead global climate strategies.
• Complaints include miscalculations of livestock emissions and missed opportunities for carbon sequestration on non-farmed land.
• The FAO’s response has been criticized for not adequately addressing these concerns, which could perpetuate higher meat production and consumption.

Key quote:

"Our concerns have barely been acknowledged, let alone seriously engaged with. It’s been like hitting a brick wall."

— Paul Behrens, Leiden University

Why this matters:

Livestock contributes significantly to global greenhouse gas emissions, and misleading data can delay urgent shifts needed to combat climate change. Accurate reporting is critical to guide policy and public behavior.

Related coverage:

• Food waste and agriculture are major drivers of methane emissions
• Academics' climate impact studies influenced by meat and dairy funding
• Federal funds for methane-cutting digesters in farms could end up boosting methane emissions