Can a CO2 pipeline developer change how farmers are treated?

The CEO of Summit Carbon Solutions says his company will treat landowners well. Critics say he's making empty promises, reports Mike Soraghan for E&E News.

In a nutshell:

Lee Blank, CEO of Summit Carbon Solutions LLC, the company behind the world's largest carbon dioxide pipeline project, pledges improved treatment of farmers compared to previous pipeline developers. The $5.5 billion project aims to transport CO2 from Midwest ethanol plants to North Dakota for disposal, aligning with President Joe Biden's climate goals. Farmers' support is crucial, but opposition has arisen due to concerns about land damage and private company authority. Blank highlights Summit's farmer-friendly terms, including compensation for crop loss and pipeline damage, but critics argue the terms fall short compared to renewable energy projects. Summit's pipeline plan recently faced rejection from North Dakota regulators.

Key quote:

“There’s nothing good about this,” said Jess Mazour, a program coordinator with the Sierra Club’s Iowa chapter who is organizing opposition to CO2 pipelines in the Midwest.

The big picture:

CO2 pipelines can have dire health consequences for both the environment and nearby communities. These pipelines carry asphyxiants that can kill people and animals if they leak or rupture. The construction and operation of such pipelines can also lead to the destruction of farmland, disrupting agricultural practices and potentially reducing crop yields.

Read the article at E&E News.

In 2022, EHN columnist Peter Dykstra explained why pipelines have become a regular item in the news cycle in recent years.

www.eenews.net

Can a CO2 pipeline developer change how farmers are treated?

Clothes that cool you, warm you — and make power as you move

Gas from thawing Arctic permafrost is changing world's climate future

‘Explosion of melt rates’: 20% of Swiss glaciers lost in five years

Climate change’s compounding pressures on rural North Carolina

The true cost of Trump's fuel economy rollbacks

Montana officials praise repeal of power plant emission regulations, watchdog groups pan decision

The surprising allies backing Boulder's climate case before the Supreme Court

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.