wildfire retardants being sprayed by plane
The National Guard/Flickrhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.

Wildfire retardants, the hot-pink mix of water and chemicals sprayed from airplanes by the U.S Forest service to combat wildfires, are under scrutiny after a recent study found they’re a serious source of heavy metal pollution in the U.S.


The research, conducted by a team from the University of Southern California and published in Environmental Science & Technology Letters, found that between 2009 and 2021, wildfire retardant application in the U.S. released at least 380,000 kg (more than 400 tons) of at least four toxic metals into the environment. Toxic metals — like cadmium, chromium and vanadium — accumulate in ecosystems and organisms and are linked to organ damage, cancer and neurological disorders.

“The heavy metals report from [the University of Southern California] has been a catalyst. It has created internal discussions about using these retardants,” Andy Stahl, the executive director of the nonprofit watchdog group Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics (FSEEE), who was not involved with the study, told EHN.

Wildfire retardant is composed of about 85% water, 10% fertilizers and a mix of other undisclosed ingredients that sticks to plants and depletes the fire of oxygen. This study cracks open the “chemical black box” of the proprietary, undisclosed ingredients in wildfire retardants, according to Stahl.

Between 2009 and 2021, over 440 million gallons of fire retardant were sprayed from airplanes onto federal, state and private land, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Most of it was applied in the western U.S., where the area burned by wildfires has increased by eight-fold over the past four decades.

The new research comes as the Forest Service stretches its capacity to put out multiple fires in the Los Angeles area, two of them ranked among the most destructive and deadly blazes in California’s history. Since January 7, the fires have destroyed at least 15,000 structures and killed 28 people. On Wednesday, January 22, a new fire broke out near Castaic, north of Los Angeles.

Firefighters have argued that retardants are an important tool for protecting communities and slowing down fire. “Without aerially applied fire retardant to slow the growth of more isolated fires, potential exists for some of these fires to grow larger before firefighters can safely fight the fires,” a Forest Service report from 2011 reads.

Application of long-term fire retardants to the western United States between 2000 and 2011 (A) and 2012 and 2019 (B).From the study, "Metals in Wildfire Suppressants"

However, a series of lawsuits brought by FSEEE that date back to 2004 have called into question the chemicals’ potential impacts on wildlife and water pollution. In 2008, a federal judge ordered the Forest Service to conduct a study of wildfire retardants’ environmental impacts. In 2011 the study was published, finding that aerial retardant posed a risk to amphibians, rodents, insects and species whose habitat is limited to small geographic areas. As a result, the Forest Service enacted "exclusion zones" where retardant would not be used and established a 300-foot buffer when applying retardant around surface water by plane.

“That fiction lasted until they realized they missed a lot of times,” Stahl said.

The Forest Service data shows the agency has violated its own restrictions 457 times on National Forest System lands since 2012. Of those, 213 intrusions have landed partially in water, either “to protect human life or public safety” (23 intrusions) or by accident (190 intrusions). These intrusions, the FSEEE argued in a 2022 lawsuit, violated the Clean Water Act.

A year later, a US District judge partially agreed with the employees, ordering the Forest Service to apply for a permit from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to regulate the spraying. The permitting process might take years, so the judge also ordered the Forest Service to report back every six months about the state of the permit. “They’re one-sentence reports, ‘we have asked the EPA for a permit.’ That’s the report,” Stahl said.

In fire-devastated areas, damaged pipes can suck in smoke, and plastic pipes can melt and release harmful chemicals into water, causing spikes in concentrations of harmful chemicals like benzene and other carcinogens. The evidence of heavy metals’ presence in wildfire retardants, Stahl argued, adds to the burden these chemicals might be posing to water treatment systems.

Heavy metals precipitate to the bottom of the cleaning ponds of these systems, concentrating in a sludge that is often sold to farmers across the country to spray on farmland. Other harmful chemicals, like PFAS or “forever chemicals”, which have been associated with birth defects, cancer and developmental delays, have also been found in sewage sludge. “Now [we realize] it may have heavy metals at superfund levels,” Stahl said.

“The challenge for the Forest Service is they’ve done such a good job marketing this magic red elixir, that it's hard for them to back away from it and say, ‘oh, it turns out that the stuff we've been pouring all over your forests and your backyards and your residential areas is actually poisonous,’” Stahl said.

 aerial view of Governors Island, New York Harbor on a partly cloudy day.

Governors Island transforms from military base to climate innovation hub

What was once a military outpost, Governors Island in New York City is now a lively incubator for climate solutions, from seaweed farming to oyster restoration and urban composting.

Thalia Juarez reports for The Guardian.

Keep reading...Show less
crowded airport terminal with arched glass ceiling.
Credit: Photo by Tomek Baginski/Unsplash

Airports are cleaning up their act with new sustainability programs

As airports face growing concerns over waste, several are stepping up their sustainability efforts, from food waste reduction to cutting out plastic and even recycling cigarette butts to keep them from entering the waste stream.

Liza Weisstuch and Hannah Good report for The Washington Post.

Keep reading...Show less
Laguna Pueblo, New Mexico with mountains in background.
Credit: Tashka/BigStock Photo ID: 169069691

Laguna Pueblo continues to suffer with legacy uranium waste, despite expanded federal compensation program

Decades of uranium mining at Laguna Pueblo left lasting contamination and health crises, even as a new law finally promises compensation to post-1971 workers.

Aviva Nathan reports for Searchlight New Mexico.

Keep reading...Show less
Rafael Mariano Grossi with Nuclear Energy Influencer Isabelle Boemeke
Photo Credit: Dean Calma / IAEA/ IAEA Imagebank/Flickr/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Copyright ©IAEA Images

From runway to reactor: a model makes nuclear power her cause

A former fashion model is swapping Instagram filters for fission rods, using social media to make nuclear energy digestible — and trendy — for mainstream audiences.

Madison Malone Kircher reports for The New York Times.

Keep reading...Show less
green wheat field during daytime.

Climate change is undercutting the MAHA movement's healthy food agenda

Extreme weather and rising emissions are making it harder for small farmers to grow nutritious food, complicating the Trump administration’s Make America Healthy Again campaign.

Lisa Held reports for Civil Eats.

Keep reading...Show less
Rows of United Nations world flags outside UN building in Geneva, Switzerland.
Photo credit: Photo by Mathias Reding on Unsplash

Plastic pollution treaty talks end with no agreement

Negotiators failed to reach a deal on a global treaty aimed at curbing plastic pollution and plan to resume talks at a later date as disputes over production limits and toxic chemicals persist.

Jennifer McDermott reports for The Associated Press.

Keep reading...Show less
A man's hands with a pen writing on a pad of paper.

Trump’s EPA rollback on climate rules may reignite legal battles between states and the federal government

The Trump administration’s move to repeal the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's authority to regulate greenhouse gases could trigger a new wave of lawsuits and state-led climate regulations, echoing past legal fights.

Marianne Lavelle reports for Inside Climate News.

Keep reading...Show less
From our Newsroom
Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro speaks with the state flag and American flag behind him.

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

silhouette of people holding hands by a lake at sunset

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

People  sitting in an outdoors table working on a big sign.

Op-ed: Why funding for the environmental justice movement must be anti-racist

We must prioritize minority-serving institutions, BIPOC-led organizations and researchers to lead environmental justice efforts.

Stay informed: sign up for The Daily Climate newsletter
Top news on climate impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered to your inbox week days.