In a landmark case, climate scientist Michael Mann won more than $1 million in a defamation lawsuit against bloggers who falsely accused him of data manipulation.
Michael Mann was awarded more than $1 million by a jury for defamation by bloggers who likened him to a convicted child molester.
The verdict highlights the ongoing harassment faced by scientists in climate change, vaccine research, and other fields.
Despite concerns about free speech, the case clarifies the legal boundaries of defamation in scientific debate.
Key quote:
“I hope this verdict sends a message that falsely attacking climate scientists is not protected speech.”
— Michael Mann, climate scientist.
Why this matters:
This victory is significant for the scientific community, emphasizing the importance of protecting researchers from unfounded and harmful allegations as well as ensuring that public discourse on vital issues like climate change remains informed and respectful.
Warren, a Dallas pipeline tycoon, sued O’Rourke in February over accusations he made on the campaign trail that Warren effectively bribed Gov. Greg Abbott with a $1 million campaign contribution following the 2021 power grid collapse.
A climate scientist may pursue his defamation lawsuit against a conservative magazine and a libertarian Washington think tank after the Supreme Court on Monday declined to intervene at this stage of the litigation.
Late-night show host John Oliver took a musical victory lap around New York City last night to announce now-bankrupt Murray Energy Corp. has dropped its defamation lawsuit against him.
The environmental activist group still faces defamation claims, but the unusual RICO allegations that raised red flags with civil liberties groups were thrown out.
