lng terminals
Federal energy regulators to review gas export terminals amid DOE's pause
Despite the Department of Energy's recent pause on approvals, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is set to continue its reviews of natural gas export terminals.
In short:
- The FERC's decision to proceed with evaluations signifies its operational independence, even as the DOE reassesses its stance on liquid natural gas (LNG) export projects.
- Environmental groups and industry observers are closely monitoring FERC's actions, especially in light of recent environmental and energy security concerns.
- The DOE's pause, focusing on a comprehensive review of market, economic, national security, and environmental factors, contrasts with FERC's ongoing project assessments.
Key quote:
"FERC is an independent agency that is supposed to rise above politics."
— Neil Chatterjee, former FERC Chair during the Trump administration.
Why this matters:
FERC's decision to proceed with LNG project reviews amidst the DOE's pause reflects the complexity of national energy policy, directly impacting both environmental health and the broader national energy strategy.
The U.S. has taken the global lead on liquid natural gas production and export, as economic promises and environmental worries collide.
Focus: How shipping more US natural gas to Europe helped fuel CO2 pollution
Climate activists rally to halt new U.S. exports of natural gas
As the US exports more gas, Louisiana communities pay the price
The U.S. is now the world's top exporter of liquefied natural gas. Towns in southern Louisiana are paying the price, write Lylla Younes and Jake Bittle in Grist.
In a nutshell:
A rush in global demand for natural gas has led to the construction of liquefaction terminals along the Gulf Coast, enabling American fossil fuel exports. Venture Global is one such company, building a terminal in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana with another underway in Cameron Parish. While this expansion is transforming the energy landscape, it has consequences for local residents, who face air pollution from flares and leaks, as well as increased risk of accidents and explosions.
Key quote:
"It's not just that each of these facilities is like a giant death star on sinking land, it's that there's so many of them," said Elizabeth Calderon, a senior attorney at the environmental nonprofit Earthjustice who has worked on cases challenging LNG terminals in south Louisiana. "This is how sacrifice zones are created."
The big picture:
Liquefaction facilities have a history of leaks and explosions, and the process involves the use of toxic chemicals that can be harmful to human health. The Louisiana terminals are built on eroding swamplands, leading to greater risk of catastrophic accidents during storms and hurricanes, putting nearby communities in the blast zone.
Read the article at Grist.
For additional context, EHN's Angela Marie Hutchinson wrote a piece aiming to amplify the voices of fenceline communities fighting toxic pollution, like those in the Gulf Coast.
After litigation and local outcry, energy company says it will not move forward with LNG plant in Florida Panhandle
The company says it reached the decision months ago, although residents only learned of it this week.
A new energy battleground: insurance for LNG terminals
These global banks made emission pledges. They still invest billions in Gulf Coast LNG exports
By the end of the decade, the Gulf Coast could see as many as 12 new liquefied natural gas terminals built along its shores.