west virginia v epa
Photo by Jackie Hope on Unsplash
'Thumb on the scale': Kagan rebukes SCOTUS environment rulings
The liberal justice criticized her conservative colleagues for refusing to let federal air and water laws "work as Congress instructed."
Top Story
How carbon emissions got rebranded as 'climate pollution'
California activists paved the way for defining climate change as an air pollution problem. Now it's federal law.
Democrats designed the climate law to be a game changer. Here's how
In a first, the measure legally defines greenhouse gases as pollution. That’ll make new regulations much tougher to challenge in court.
Bob Bullard interview: Supreme Court’s climate change ruling places ‘uneven burdens on overburdened communities’
Curbing federal authority over carbon emissions reductions and increasing heat waves will have a cascading effect on the most vulnerable communities, says the activist of environmental justice.
Impact of Supreme Court's climate ruling spreads
The legal doctrine that the conservative justices used to strike down an EPA regulation in late June is popping up in a host of new legal challenges — including many having nothing to do with climate change.
Dave Dickey: Major Questions Doctrine new major trouble for executive branch of government
Last month, Chief Justice John Roberts and his conservative cohorts ruled against an obsolete EPA plan to create a new but largely undefined doctrine that federal judges across the country will use to stymie all manner of federal agency rulemaking.
“A new zone of uncertainty”: What West Virginia v. EPA means for water and environment
The Supreme Court’s empowerment of the “major questions” doctrine could limit the federal government’s agility at a time when it is urgently needed.
ORIGINAL REPORTING
MOST POPULAR
CLIMATE