a protest sign that says there is no planet b.

Trump’s dismissal of climate scientists threatens U.S. leadership and global research ties

The Trump administration’s removal of nearly 400 scientists from the National Climate Assessment signals escalating cuts to U.S. climate science, raising concerns over national and international research collaborations.

Holly Young reports for Deutsche Welle.

In short:

Nearly 400 scientists working on the sixth National Climate Assessment (NCA6) were dismissed, jeopardizing a congressionally mandated report that guides U.S. climate policy and offers data valuable worldwide.
The dismissals follow months of cuts to federal science bodies, including NOAA and the U.S. Global Change Research Program, leading to reduced data collection and concerns over the integrity of future research.
International climate science collaborations are already strained, with some U.S.-based scientists seeking to relocate abroad, and European leaders working to attract displaced researchers.

Key quote:

“There’s no way to replicate this incredible innovative scientific enterprise that we had in the United States overnight anywhere else.”

— Rachel Cleetus, Union of Concerned Scientists

Why this matters:

The United States has long played a central role in advancing climate science, thanks to its robust funding, infrastructure, and vast geographic diversity. The National Climate Assessment, mandated by Congress, not only informs domestic policy but also provides essential data and models used worldwide. Cuts to such programs risk degrading the quality and availability of data that scientists rely on to understand and predict climate change impacts. These setbacks come at a time when extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and shifting climate patterns pose growing threats to communities everywhere. The ripple effects of reduced U.S. participation will be felt globally, as fewer data inputs and collaborative opportunities can hinder international climate forecasting and policy planning.

www.dw.com

Trump’s dismissal of climate scientists threatens U.S. leadership and global research ties

Fossil fuel advocate shapes Republican push to cut renewable energy funding

Trump administration may weaken or block first national workplace heat protections

World leaders back ocean treaty and new marine reserves, but critics say action still lags

New protections for nature must account for climate risks, scientists say

Alaska braces for rising heat as warming climate shatters old norms

Mercury contamination in Arctic wildlife may persist for generations despite global emission cuts

Trump’s funding freeze threatens Alaska village’s clean energy future

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.