Paul Ehrlich

Paul Ehrlich: A journey through science and politics

In his new book, the famous scientist reflects on an unparalleled career on our fascinating, ever-changing planet.

As I’ve aged, I’ve found myself increasingly diverted from my great interest in human achievements in science to increasing distress at certain features of modern human culture that I believe threaten us all, and by all I mean the natural world, not just ourselves.


I, of course, have lived in an amazing time for a scientist. When I was first fooling around with butterflies, scientists knew nothing about DNA. We thought humanity’s prehistory was a pretty straight line from a chimplike ancestor, through Australopithecus, to Homo erectus, to Neanderthals and Homo sapiens. Only later did scientists uncover the great diversity of our ancestors and the evolutionary relatives with which they interacted. Doctors had just begun using catheters to diagnose problems in beating hearts, electron microscopes had just been developed, nuclear power and nuclear proliferation were still in the future, computers did not then control much of human activity as they do now, no artificial satellites were circling Earth, and no human being had ever ventured above the atmosphere.

That we now know so much more about how organisms function and evolve and how ecological systems work than was known when I caught that Euphydryas phaeton in Bethesda at the age of fifteen I find mind-boggling. At a more plebeian level, when I started at Stanford in 1959 we had no Xerox machines, no smartphones, no desktop computers, and, of course, no word processing and no email.

On the cultural front, as noted earlier, I might have been able to write a similar screed of social and political accomplishment for America if I were writing this in, say, 1980, before the Reagan presidency set us on the facilis descensus Averno.

In 1980 the situation of African Americans compared to twenty-five years earlier had improved greatly — lynchings had died out in the South, no facilities in Lawrence, Kansas, were still segregated, and increasing numbers of people were realizing that those with darker skins could be top scholars and excellent politicians. Women were well on their way to penetrating niches once reserved for men, and I had taken much of my instrument training from a female pilot.

People in religious minorities were infrequently at risk of violence.

Further, official notice of and action on environmental problems was, if inadequate, in existence and cheering, bolstered by some landmark legislation. Much of that was reversed by Reagan, and since Reagan, socioculturally it’s been at best a roller-coaster of destruction of environmental safeguards and social safety nets followed by the reinstitution of these safeguards, greater acknowledgment of the threat of fossil fuel – induced climate change, and attempts to increase access to affordable medical care and the like.

Nevertheless, inequality has continued to grow, and there has been a decline generally in American indirect democracy, epitomized by the nearly successful Trump putsch of January 6, 2021, a set of events virtually inconceivable a decade or more before. To cope with the crises of biodiversity loss, climate change, overpopulation, and threats to the provision of life’s essentials, far more is needed than scientific reports that are too often largely ignored.

To rescue the human enterprise in the long run requires strong action in the short run directed toward saving biodiversity and bringing the human enterprise within sustainable limits.


This is an excerpt from Life: A Journey Through Science and Politics by Paul R. Ehrlich is published by Yale University Press.

Banner photo credit: Left - Wikipedia Commons; Right - Yale University Press.

Alaska oil & gas drilling pipeline with snowy mountains in background.
Credit: cec72/ BigStock Photo ID: 21712223

Trump administration moves to revive controversial drilling plan in protected Alaska wilderness

The Trump administration is moving to scrap environmental protections in Alaska’s North Slope, opening up millions of acres of fragile wilderness to oil drilling and mining.

Lisa Friedman reports for The New York Times.

Keep reading...Show less
A row of wind turbines in a field on a sunny day.

US Department of Energy cancels billions in clean energy and carbon capture grants

The U.S. Department of Energy has pulled $3.7 billion in grants for carbon capture and industrial decarbonization, halting dozens of projects that had bipartisan backing and were designed to cut emissions from cement, chemicals, and food production.

Jake Spring reports for The Washington Post.

Keep reading...Show less
a factory with a lot of glowing molten steel.

Trump’s reversal on U.S. Steel sale raises fears of long-term coal dependence in Pennsylvania

President Donald Trump celebrated the sale of U.S. Steel to Japan’s Nippon Steel on Friday, a move that could lock in coal-powered steel production for another generation despite environmental and economic shifts away from the fuel.

Kiley Bense reports for Inside Climate News.

Keep reading...Show less
Large gray concrete columns.

Charleston climate case sparks national security debate in federal court

A South Carolina judge questioned whether a local lawsuit accusing oil companies of climate deception could undermine national security, as President Trump’s executive order claims.

Karen Zraick reports for The New York Times.

Keep reading...Show less
Scientist wearing purple gloves looking at samples in a tray.
Credit: CDC/Unsplash

Trump administration hands political appointees sweeping authority over federal science

A Trump executive order claims to champion scientific integrity but scientists warn it centralizes political power over research and undermines independence.

Carolyn Y. Johnson reports for The Washington Post.

Keep reading...Show less
An oil pipeline stretching across a landscape.

Trump officials court support in Alaska for drilling and massive gas pipeline plan

The Trump administration sent top officials to Alaska this week to advance oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and revive a $44 billion natural gas pipeline project aimed at exports to Asia.

Becky Bohrer reports for The Associated Press.

Keep reading...Show less
Wildfire with billowing smoke rising from the flames.

Wildfire smoke from Canada worsens air pollution across central U.S. as alerts expand

Smoke from dozens of uncontrolled Canadian wildfires has drifted into the central U.S., triggering air quality alerts from North Dakota to Georgia and prompting warnings for people with health vulnerabilities.

Aria Bendix reports for NBC News.

Keep reading...Show less
From our Newsroom
Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro speaks with the state flag and American flag behind him.

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

silhouette of people holding hands by a lake at sunset

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

wildfire retardants being sprayed by plane

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.

Stay informed: sign up for The Daily Climate newsletter
Top news on climate impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered to your inbox week days.