Trump’s climate aid cuts leave poor nations struggling with extreme weather

Donald Trump’s rollback of U.S. overseas aid is slashing global climate finance, reducing support for developing nations facing climate disasters.

Fiona Harvey reports for The Guardian.

In short:

The U.S. contributed about $8 of every $100 in global climate finance from rich nations last year, but Trump's cuts are expected to significantly reduce that amount.
The administration has withdrawn from the Paris Agreement, halted USAID climate funding, and stopped contributions to international climate funds.
Advocates warn these cuts will make it harder for vulnerable nations to cope with worsening climate-related disasters.

Key quote:

“By abruptly axing nearly a tenth of the limited funds for climate protection in developing countries, [the U.S.] is effectively abandoning millions of communities who have done nothing to cause global heating but who are losing homes, livelihoods and lives because of it.”

— Anne Jellema, executive director of 350.org

Why this matters:

Developing nations already struggle with climate-driven disasters like floods, droughts, and storms, often diverting funds from essential services to cover damages. For years, wealthier nations, including the United States, have been expected to provide financial assistance to help vulnerable countries adapt to climate change and transition to cleaner energy sources. The loss of U.S. support is likely to slow down these efforts, making it harder for at-risk communities to rebuild after disasters or implement preventive measures like early warning systems and resilient infrastructure.

This shift comes at a time when scientists warn that climate change is accelerating, with rising global temperatures fueling more frequent and intense natural disasters. Without financial backing from the U.S. — historically one of the largest contributors to greenhouse gas emissions — developing nations may struggle to meet climate goals, further widening the gap between wealthy and vulnerable populations.

www.theguardian.com

Trump’s climate aid cuts leave poor nations struggling with extreme weather

Chilean mackerel now sourced for popular Patagonia tinned fish

Business class flights are major polluters. Is cutting them the key to decarbonising air travel?

Opinion: How Europe’s climate and sustainability rules were shredded while citizens remained in the dark

Scientists fed biochar to cows. Here’s what happened

Republicans celebrate as lesser prairie chicken loses threatened, endangered status

The real economic impact of clean energy

Study: 2025 emissions rise due to Trump-era policies

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.