baltimore
A Maryland judge dismisses Baltimore's climate lawsuit against oil companies
A Baltimore judge dismissed the city's climate lawsuit against major oil companies, saying state courts cannot address global issues like climate change.
In short:
- Filed in 2018, Baltimore's lawsuit aimed to hold oil companies like Chevron, Exxon, and BP accountable for environmental damages.
- Judge Brown ruled that federal law, not state law, governs such global pollution-based complaints.
- Baltimore plans to appeal, arguing that the lawsuit addresses consumer fraud, not emission regulation.
Key quote:
"Global pollution-based complaints were never intended by Congress to be handled by individual states."
— Videtta A. Brown, Baltimore Circuit Court Judge
Why this matters:
This ruling sets a precedent that could limit state-level legal actions against oil companies for climate-related damages. It challenges efforts to hold fossil fuel industries accountable for their role in climate change.
Laurel Peltier took on multi-million dollar private energy companies scamming Baltimore’s low-income households, one victim at a time
Policymakers hoped deregulated energy markets would lower utility bills through open competition. Energy advocates found the opposite: retail energy companies are fleecing low-income communities of color in cities like Baltimore.
More than two dozen cities and states are suing Big Oil over climate change – they just got a boost from the US Supreme Court
Baltimore County leaders to consider a new way to pay for cost of climate change
Paying for damage done by climate change can cost local governments big bucks. The Baltimore County Council is considering establishing a resilience authority to help finance climate change-related projects.