biodiversity
Credit: Alexa Accuardi/Unsplash
Louisiana coastal restoration project faces new turmoil over hidden environmental report
An escalating political and legal battle threatens Louisiana’s $3 billion Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion project, as allegations emerge that state officials concealed a critical environmental study.
In short:
- Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry accused former Gov. John Bel Edwards’ administration of withholding a study showing the project would produce significantly less land than earlier estimates, prompting the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to suspend its permit.
- The 2022 confidential memo revealed that state attorneys considered potential federal charges and warned the Corps could revoke the permit if it discovered the withheld report, which ultimately occurred last month.
- Conservationists argue the controversy is politically motivated, while fishing industry leaders welcome the halt, fearing the project’s impact on shrimp and oyster harvesting.
Key quote:
“They hid the bad stuff and only showed the (Corps) the version they liked. Science is easy when you just delete the inconvenient parts!”
— Gov. Jeff Landry, on the social media platform X
Why this matters:
Louisiana’s wetlands are disappearing at an alarming rate, losing land equivalent to a football field nearly every hour. Projects like the Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion aim to reverse this by redirecting sediment-laden river water to rebuild marshes, a critical defense against hurricanes and rising seas. Yet such efforts come with complex trade-offs: While designed to combat climate-driven coastal erosion, they can disrupt local ecosystems and industries, especially fishing and oyster harvesting that sustain communities and cultural traditions. The current controversy underscores not only the environmental and engineering challenges of such large-scale interventions but also the political and legal complexities that can derail them.
Related: Louisiana governor challenges costly coastal restoration plan
Keep reading...Show less
Credit: Patrice Bouchard/Unsplash
Most North American bird species are declining as once-safe habitats falter
Bird populations across North America are plummeting, with three-quarters of species in decline even in their most stable habitats, according to a new study.
In short:
- A comprehensive study found that 75% of North America’s bird species declined between 2007 and 2021, including many that were once abundant.
- Habitat loss from farming, coastal development, climate change, and pesticide use are driving declines, even in previously safe areas.
- While overall trends are bleak, some localized bird populations are stable or growing, offering insight for future conservation efforts.
Key quote:
“Those locations where species were once thriving, and where the environment and habitat was once really suitable for them, are now the places where they’re suffering the most.”
— Alison Johnston, ecological statistician, University of St. Andrews and lead researcher of the study
Why this matters:
Birds serve as vital indicators of environmental health. Their decline reflects the widespread degradation of ecosystems that also support human life. As habitats vanish under the pressures of agriculture, urban development, and climate change, the intricate balance sustaining both wildlife and people unravels. The rollback of environmental protections—such as those under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act—further threatens species survival. The weakening health of bird populations often parallels human environmental challenges, like worsening air quality and the spread of contaminants. Understanding and addressing these complex, interconnected threats is essential to protecting both wildlife and the human communities that share their habitats.
Related coverage:
Keep reading...Show less
Credit: Marek Piwnicki/Unsplash
Trump accelerates environmental rollbacks at unprecedented pace in first 100 days
Donald Trump’s administration has moved to dismantle 145 environmental protections in just 100 days, outpacing the entire first term’s rollbacks and targeting rules on pollution, fossil fuels, and public lands.
In short:
- Since January 20, the Trump administration has initiated 145 actions to weaken or repeal environmental protections, surpassing the 110 rollbacks made during his first presidency.
- Policies affected include clean air and water regulations, wildlife protections, and climate policies such as the Paris Agreement and limiting fossil fuel use, while new drilling and mining projects have been fast-tracked.
- Legal experts warn that many rollbacks bypass proper rule-making procedures, leading to lawsuits that could invalidate several actions, although the administration continues to push its deregulatory agenda aggressively.
Key quote:
“What we’ve seen in this first 100 days is unprecedented – the deregulatory ambition of this administration is mind-blowing.”
— Michael Burger, expert in climate law at Columbia University
Why this matters:
Environmental regulations are the foundation of public health and ecological resilience in the United States. Protections for clean air and water, limits on toxic pollution, and policies addressing climate change safeguard millions of people from disease, natural disasters, and degraded living conditions. The rapid pace and scope of rollbacks threaten to undermine decades of bipartisan work to support economic growth while protecting the environment. Moreover, bypassing established legal procedures weakens democratic norms and may erode public trust in environmental governance.
Read more:
Keep reading...Show less
Newsletter
Arctic plants reveal complex shifts as climate change accelerates tundra transformation
Ecosystems across the Arctic tundra are experiencing unpredictable plant changes, signaling widespread environmental shifts linked to rapid warming.
In short:
- Over 40 years, researchers studied more than 2,000 plant communities across 45 Arctic sites, finding no consistent winners or losers as temperatures and growing seasons changed.
- Taller, competitive shrubs are expanding rapidly, outcompeting traditional tundra flora like flowering plants, mosses, and lichens, which threatens species such as caribou that rely on these plants.
- While biodiversity is increasing in some areas, scientists warn these changes may destabilize fragile ecosystems, impacting Arctic wildlife and Indigenous communities dependent on traditional food sources.
Key quote:
“All these changes that we’re observing, they’re not limited to the Arctic. We may see them in the Arctic, but the consequences spread far beyond the confines of the region.”
— Mariana García Criado, postdoctoral researcher in tundra biodiversity, University of Edinburgh
Why this matters:
The Arctic is warming four times faster than the global average, making it a critical indicator of climate-driven environmental change. As plant communities shift, the cascading effects extend beyond the Arctic. Migratory birds, global weather patterns, and even carbon storage capacities are at risk. The study’s findings emphasize that climate change does not produce uniform outcomes. While increased biodiversity may sound positive, in the Arctic it often signals ecological upheaval that could portend similar transformations elsewhere.
Related: Scientists test pumping seawater to slow Arctic ice loss, but questions remain
Keep reading...Show less
Newsletter
Credit: Mike Newbry/Unsplash
Wildfires near Jerusalem force evacuations and disrupt national ceremonies
A fast-moving wildfire near Jerusalem forced evacuations, disrupted memorial events, and led Israel to seek international firefighting aid as strong winds and dry conditions fueled the blaze.
In short:
- Wildfires near Jerusalem prompted the evacuation of several towns and the closure of major roads, coinciding with Israel’s annual memorial day.
- Firefighting efforts were hampered by high winds and dry weather, with planes unable to operate; at least 19 people sustained light injuries.
- Israel requested international assistance, and the Palestinian Authority offered help, though Israeli officials have not confirmed whether they would accept it.
Key quote:
“This specific fire was advancing at eight meters per second. There has been nothing like it. When we talk about global warming, this is the reality.”
— Eyal Caspi, head of Israel’s fire and rescue service
Why this matters:
Wildfires are becoming more frequent and intense worldwide, driven by rising global temperatures and changing weather patterns. In Israel and other Mediterranean regions, hotter, drier conditions extend fire seasons and increase risks to both human life and natural ecosystems. Fires can devastate forests, harm biodiversity, and pollute air quality, threatening both environmental and public health. As climate change accelerates, communities worldwide must contend with both the direct dangers of fires and the broader environmental shifts that make such disasters more common and severe.
Related:
Keep reading...Show less
Top Story
Credit: monahan/Big Stock Photo
Trump’s first 100 days bring sweeping rollbacks to climate protections and environmental oversight
President Donald Trump has issued dozens of executive orders in his first 100 days, targeting climate policy, energy regulation, and environmental science across the federal government.
In short:
- Trump signed 54 executive orders on his first day back in office, including re-exiting the Paris Agreement and declaring a national energy emergency to boost fossil fuel production.
- The administration dismissed the authors of the National Climate Assessment and established a new agency, the Department of Government Efficiency, which has overseen significant cuts to staffing and funding for federal science agencies.
- The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced plans for the biggest regulatory rollback in U.S. history, including reversing limits on greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels.
Key quote:
"It has long been understood that good policy depends on careful analysis and good science, and we're seeing the capacity to deliver that foundation systematically undermined."
— Dan Esty, professor of environmental law and policy, Yale University
Why this matters:
Environmental protections are often built slowly, layer by layer, based on years of scientific research and public input. Undoing those protections can happen much faster, especially through executive orders and budget cuts that bypass Congress. Trump’s second-term push to deregulate climate and energy policy comes as scientists warn that the window to avoid the worst effects of global warming is rapidly closing. The rollback of carbon regulations, suppression of climate science, and weakening of federal oversight on air and water pollution can contribute to increased exposure to harmful pollutants, particularly for vulnerable communities.
These moves could also undermine the U.S.'s credibility in global climate talks, weaken international cooperation, and entrench fossil fuel dependence at a moment when climate-related disasters are becoming more frequent and severe. For families, communities, and ecosystems, the health consequences could last well beyond a single administration.
Keep reading...Show less
Newsletter
Credit: Nightman1965/Big Stock Photo
Trump greenlights deep-sea mining as U.S. companies clash with global law and environmental warnings
President Trump’s executive order jump-started a controversial push for commercial seabed mining, igniting a partisan battle in Congress and drawing international criticism.
In short:
- The Metals Company filed the first U.S. permit application for seabed mining just days after President Trump signed an executive order encouraging the practice in both U.S. and international waters.
- At a congressional hearing, Republicans emphasized the need to reduce mineral dependence on China, while Democrats questioned the business viability and environmental safety of seabed mining.
- The Clarion-Clipperton Zone, where the Metals Company aims to mine, holds massive mineral deposits, but critics warn of unknown ecological impacts and international legal conflicts.
Key quote:
“The industry’s financial models are based on wildly optimistic assumptions and fail to reflect the volatility and reality of global mineral markets.”
— Representative Maxine E. Dexter (D-Oregon)
Why this matters:
Seabed mining targets vast stretches of the ocean floor rich in metals like nickel, cobalt and manganese — key ingredients in modern electronics, renewables, and energy storage. But the deep sea is Earth’s least explored ecosystem, and disturbing it risks harming species that haven’t even been identified. The ocean floor between Hawaii and Mexico, where these mineral-rich nodules lie, is thought to harbor hundreds of unique marine species. Mining could unleash sediment plumes, disrupt life cycles, and alter the food web from the bottom up. International law has long held that these waters are a global commons managed by the International Seabed Authority, but the U.S. is now asserting its own path. With geopolitical tensions around rare earth elements rising — particularly with China’s dominance in refining — industry pressure is building. Yet the potential ecological impacts remain uncertain and possibly irreversible.
Related:
Keep reading...Show less
ORIGINAL REPORTING
MOST POPULAR
CLIMATE
