democrats
Newsletter
Credit: Alexandru Nika/Big Stock Photo
Lawmakers investigate potential shale collusion affecting federal land leases
A group of Democratic lawmakers is investigating if shale oil companies colluded to manipulate oil prices, potentially affecting their federal land leases and operations.
In short:
- Democratic lawmakers have asked the Department of the Interior to consider suspending or banning oil companies from federal land leases due to alleged antitrust violations.
- An FTC investigation found evidence suggesting at least eight major shale producers, including ExxonMobil and Pioneer, engaged in collusion to drive oil prices up.
- The lawmakers' request follows the FTC’s six-month review of the ExxonMobil-Pioneer merger, which allowed the merger but restricted Pioneer’s former CEO from joining ExxonMobil’s board.
Key quote:
“If a company is found guilty of something like collusion, we have regulations in place that make them ineligible to hold a lease in the future.”
— Liz Klein, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Director
Why this matters:
Collusion among shale producers could artificially inflate oil prices, burdening consumers and violating antitrust laws. Regulatory actions against these companies could disrupt their operations and impact their financial stability.
Related EHN coverage:
Keep reading...Show less
Newsletter
Credit: Possessed Photography/Unsplash
Senate Democrats shift stance on Biden's EV policies amid reelection pressures
Amid the 2024 election campaign, some Senate Democrats in tough reelection races are distancing themselves from President Biden's electric vehicle policies as Republicans, led by Donald Trump, criticize the EV agenda.
In short:
- Trump has made opposition to EVs a key part of his campaign, criticizing Biden’s EV policies as harmful to the auto industry.
- Vulnerable Senate Democrats are modifying their stance on Biden’s EV policies, reflecting concerns in their home states about economic impacts and ties to China.
- The fossil fuel industry is funding ads in swing states to link Democratic senators to Biden's EV push, framing it as a threat to traditional auto jobs.
Key quote:
“The U.S. must ban Chinese electric vehicles now, and stop a flood of Chinese government-subsidized cars that threaten Ohio auto jobs, and our national and economic security.”
— Sherrod Brown, U.S. Senator from Ohio
Why this matters:
In states with significant automotive manufacturing, the push for EVs has been met with concerns over job losses and economic displacement. The transition to electric cars involves not just a shift in consumer preferences but also a substantial transformation in manufacturing processes and supply chains. This has made some Democratic senators wary of fully endorsing the administration's policies, fearing backlash from constituents who rely on the traditional auto industry for their livelihoods.
Keep reading...Show less
Newsletter
Credit: koson/Big Stock Photo
Republicans challenge federal and California electric vehicle mandates
Arizona Republican leaders have initiated legal actions against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and California for imposing electric vehicle rules they deem overreaching.
In short:
- Arizona Republicans, led by House Speaker Ben Toma and Senate President Warren Petersen, have filed lawsuits against the EPA's vehicle emissions standards and a California rule on electric trucks.
- The lawsuits argue that these regulations exceed legal authority, lack proper analysis, and could negatively impact jobs and the economy.
- These legal challenges follow previous actions this year, including another lawsuit against the EPA regarding air pollution standards.
Key quote:
"The EPA’s tailpipe emissions rules prioritize politics over science, posing a greater threat to public health by inflating the cost of essential and everyday goods."
— Tony Bradley, president and CEO, Arizona Trucking Association
Why this matters:
This legal standoff highlights the resistance among some states to federally mandated or influenced environmental policies, particularly those that demand rapid changes to existing infrastructure and market dynamics. Critics, like those leading the charge in Arizona, argue that such mandates place undue burdens on states and consumers, potentially leading to increased costs and economic disruption, especially in regions heavily reliant on traditional industries and older modes of transportation.
Transitioning to electric vehicles is seen by many experts as a crucial step in addressing urban air quality issues, reducing respiratory diseases, and curbing the overall impact of climate change. However, the path to such transitions is fraught with economic and logistical challenges that necessitate thoughtful consideration of local contexts and capabilities.
Keep reading...Show less
Newsletter
Credit: CHUTTERSNAP/Unsplash
Electric vehicle purchases show a political divide in the US
A study reveals a stark divide in electric vehicle (EV) ownership in the U.S., with Democrats far more likely to purchase EVs than Republicans, reflecting broader political and cultural tensions.
In short:
- Democratic counties significantly outpace Republican ones in EV adoption, despite similar economic conditions.
- Political leaders and cultural attitudes have polarized perceptions of electric vehicles, with significant opposition from Republican figures.
- Researchers suggest that visibility and familiarity with EVs could encourage broader acceptance across political divides.
Key quote:
"There's an incredible correlation with political ideology."
— Lucas Davis, professor of business and technology, University of California, Berkeley
Why this matters:
The political polarization of electric vehicle adoption could hinder the U.S.'s ability to meet its climate goals. Bridging this divide may require shifting perceptions of EVs beyond the political and cultural conflicts that currently frame them.
Keep reading...Show less
Newsletter
Credit: Joshua Sukoff/Unsplash
Democrats challenge Biden's opposition to youth climate lawsuit
Congressional Democrats are calling out the Biden administration for its efforts to derail a pivotal youth-led climate lawsuit.
In short:
- A group of 29 Democratic Congress members and Sen. Bernie Sanders urges the Biden administration to halt its attempts to dismiss the Juliana v. United States climate case.
- They argue this legal battle is crucial for young Americans seeking to protect their constitutional rights against government inaction on climate change.
- The Department of Justice's actions to prevent the case from going to trial are deemed unprecedented and a silencing of youth advocacy for environmental justice.
Key quote:
"As decades of evidence in the record show, the political branches predominantly choose short-term economic gains rather than face the difficult task of solving the issue of climate change head-on."
— Congressional Democrats in an amicus brief
Why this matters:
Young voters have become a crucial demographic for the Democratic Party, often championing more radical solutions to climate change. Seeing the administration oppose a lawsuit that embodies their fears and hopes for the future might lead to disillusionment or decreased enthusiasm among these younger supporters, potentially affecting voter turnout and support.
Plaintiffs in Held vs Montana argue that: “We are entitled to a ‘clean and healthful’ environment. Montana’s policies are endangering that.”
Keep reading...Show less
Newsletter
Credit: Federico Beccari/Unsplash
Democratic governors vie for climate funding under Biden's signature climate law
Democratic governors are unveiling ambitious climate plans to compete for federal funds, aiming to shape a greener future.
In short:
- Governors are proposing varied strategies to reduce emissions and embrace clean energy, leveraging the Inflation Reduction Act.
- Plans include incentives for renewable energy, building decarbonization, and the adoption of hydrogen and electric transportation.
- The competition not only seeks to address climate change but also positions governors as future leaders in the Democratic Party.
Key quote:
"We’re getting a snapshot of what’s on the table in each state."
— Irene Nielson, Natural Resources Defense Council.
Why this matters:
Across the United States, states are taking diverse and innovative steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reflecting a commitment to combat climate change even in the absence of strong federal mandates. These targets are part of broader climate action plans that detail how states intend to achieve their goals, including resilience strategies, clean energy targets, and economic and social objectives.
California will soon have the largest oil drilling setbacks in the U.S. Experts say other states can learn from this move.
Keep reading...Show less
Newsletter
Big Stock Photo
Biden needs young voters. Can his climate policy rally them?
Young people helped deliver victories for Democrats in the last two election cycles, motivated by issues like climate change, abortion rights and gun control. But Biden risks losing some of those voters — not to Trump, his likely opponent, but to disaffection.
ORIGINAL REPORTING
MOST POPULAR
CLIMATE
