ira
Newsletter
The IRA boosts clean energy with a $240 billion investment, but more is needed
In the wake of the Inflation Reduction Act, a new analysis reveals a significant private sector response, multiplying government investments in clean energy nearly fivefold.
In short:
- The private sector's contribution of $5.47 for every government dollar has led to a surge in clean energy investment.
- Federal tax credits primarily fuel the $34 billion in government spending, with overall investments spanning various technologies.
- Despite substantial investment growth, experts caution that current levels may not suffice to meet the U.S.'s ambitious climate goals.
Key quote:
“It’s proving the value of the federal government taking the lead, putting in place policy that says, ‘This is the direction that we’re headed: supporting decarbonization, supporting clean energy.'”
— Hannah Hess, associate director of climate and energy at Rhodium Group
Why this matters:
The Inflation Reduction Act has catalyzed unprecedented investment in clean energy, underlining the federal government's pivotal role in steering economic transitions toward sustainability. This movement signals a robust push towards decarbonization and energy innovation, crucial for meeting national and global climate targets.
After passage of the Inflation Reduction Act, those in the trenches working on climate mitigation, climate solutions, clean energy and climate justice began to feel optimistic about their goals.
Keep reading...Show less
Top Story
Exploring the impact of the Inflation Reduction Act on America's energy communities
The Inflation Reduction Act aims to transition America's energy communities toward a greener future, but not all are poised to benefit equally.
In short:
- The Act provides financial incentives for communities affected by the decline of coal and oil industries, aiming to foster new, sustainable industries.
- A study by MIT highlights the limitations of the Act's scope, pointing out that many areas dependent on fossil fuels for jobs in sectors like steelmaking and fertilizer production may be overlooked.
- Federal support is available, but the complexity of navigating these resources poses challenges for smaller communities.
Key quote:
"As we transition to a low carbon world, energy costs are going to go up and these areas or sectors might be harmed, but they would be missed by the way we define energy communities."
— Christopher Knittel, economist at the MIT-Sloane School of Business.
Why this matters:
This topic underscores the balance between advancing environmental policies and ensuring economic stability for all communities involved. It's crucial for national discussions on sustainable transition, highlighting the need for inclusive policies that consider the diverse economic landscapes across the country.
Opinion: House Speaker Mike Johnson’s climate change playbook — deny the science, take the funding
Keep reading...Show less
Minn. will spend $3M IRA grant on climate plan outreach
Frank Jossi of the Energy News Network writes about Minnesota's plan to use Inflation Reduction Act funds to study the impacts of emission reductions in disadvantaged communities and other initiatives.
In a nutshell:
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has secured a $3 million federal grant to enhance the state's climate strategies, with a particular focus on benefiting lower-income communities. The grant, provided under the Climate Pollution Reduction Grants program, will support the development and evaluation of climate action plans and fund initiatives to implement those plans. The MPCA plans to conduct a study on the potential impact of emission reductions in disadvantaged communities, aligning with the Biden administration's Justice 40 Initiative, which seeks to ensure 40% of the benefits go to these communities.
Key quote:
David Bael, environmental economic analyst at the Pollution Control Agency said the qualitative benefits analysis will implement a “health impact assessment” focused on low-income and disadvantaged communities.
The big picture:
Greenhouse gas emissions have far-reaching health impacts, particularly for disadvantaged communities. The disproportionate exposure to pollution in these communities exacerbates existing health disparities, leading to increased respiratory and cardiovascular problems. Studies have shown that emissions from various sources, such as power plants and transportation, contribute to the prevalence of fine particles, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, and volatile organic compounds, all of which pose significant health risks. Addressing these emissions and implementing climate solutions in an equitable manner is crucial to mitigating the adverse health effects faced by vulnerable populations and promoting environmental justice.
For more details, check out the article at Energy News Network.
For additional context, read Susan Anenberg's excellent piece focusing on how the benefits of climate mitigation—as opposed to costs—can serve to motivate action.
Keep reading...Show less
Wisconsin's rural governments are at a disadvantage when it comes to competing for federal climate funds
The federal Inflation Reduction Act provides historic clean energy incentives to local governments across the country, including in Wisconsin. But taking full advantage of those opportunities is often more difficult for rural communities.
ORIGINAL REPORTING
MOST POPULAR
CLIMATE
