protection
US ocean protection plan includes commercial fishing areas, sparking debate
New information reveals the Biden administration’s ocean conservation strategy considers areas with commercial fishing as protected, causing concern among scientists.
In short:
- The U.S. aims to preserve 30% of its marine areas, counting some zones that allow commercial fishing as protected.
- Scientists argue that allowing commercial fishing undermines the conservation goals intended to support biodiversity.
- The debate highlights differing global standards on what qualifies as a conserved area.
Key quote:
“Saying that these areas that are touted to be for biodiversity conservation should also do double duty for fishing as well, especially highly impactful gears that are for large-scale commercial take, there’s just a cognitive dissonance there.”
— Kirsten Grorud-Colvert, marine biologist at Oregon State University
Why this matters:
Environmentalists argue that commercial fishing in protected areas can undermine conservation goals. These areas are often designated to help replenish fish stocks and protect diverse marine ecosystems. However, fishing activities, especially those involving trawling or large-scale nets, can damage habitats and lead to overfishing, threatening the very species these zones aim to protect.
Some U.S. wolverines to be protected by Endangered Species Act
Developing countries need more money to protect themselves from climate change
How the US supreme court and an Idaho couple upended wetlands protection
Often dismissed as dismal wet bogs and rampantly cleared since European arrival in the US, the underappreciated importance of wetlands has been placed into sharp relief by a supreme court ruling that has plunged many of these ecosystems into new peril.
BLM wants to protect the Placitas area from oil and gas extraction
U.S. Interior Secretary Deb Haaland wants to withdraw nearly 4,213 acres of public lands from oil and gas extraction for 50 years “to protect, preserve, and promote the scenic integrity, cultural importance, recreational values, and wildlife habitat connectivity within the Placitas area,” according to the six-page draft proposal.