
A California city, facing sea level rise, weighs relocating coastal highway to protect beach from erosion
About 30 miles north of San Diego, a seaside stretch of was once part of U.S. Highway 101 in Carlsbad may soon be rerouted inland as officials in the Southern California city face mounting pressure to act before rising seas and crumbling cliffs force an emergency retreat.
Daniel C Vock reports for Bloomberg.
In short:
- Erosion is threatening a section of Carlsbad Boulevard, with parts of the road already collapsing and “king tides” regularly flooding the highway.
- City leaders propose relocating the vulnerable stretch inland, restoring coastal wetlands, and creating space for pedestrians and cyclists — a “retreat now” strategy rarely attempted by other U.S. cities.
- Political support, public opinion, and steep costs — including a potential $150 million bridge — pose challenges as Carlsbad seeks funding amid declining state resources and federal cutbacks.
Key quote:
“No matter what your perspective is on climate, the coastline is eroding, and it is coming in.”
— Tom Frank, transportation director and chief engineer, City of Carlsbad
Why this matters:
As seas rise and storms intensify, many coastal cities are being forced to choose between defending the status quo and preparing for the inevitable. California’s rugged coast, with its cliffs and bluffs, makes traditional shoreline protection strategies — like beach replenishment — harder to maintain than on the East Coast. Hard armoring with boulders may temporarily preserve infrastructure but accelerates sand loss and damages beach ecosystems.
Carlsbad’s situation is notable because most of its coastal land is public, meaning officials can act without having to buy out homes or businesses. But the broader challenge is that “managed retreat” remains politically unpopular and financially daunting. Federal support for proactive climate adaptation has shrunk under President Trump’s administration, even as local governments face growing climate threats. Carlsbad’s decision — whether to retreat with foresight or wait for disaster — is a preview of the dilemma facing dozens of U.S. coastal communities in the coming decades.