BP shifts focus back to fossil fuels, slashing green investments

BP will increase spending on oil and gas while cutting more than $5 billion from its low-carbon investment plans, citing misplaced optimism about the energy transition.

Jillian Ambrose reports for The Guardian.

In short:

BP will invest $10 billion annually in fossil fuels and scale back its commitment to renewable energy, producing 2.4 million barrels of oil and gas daily by 2030.
CEO Murray Auchincloss said BP had moved “too far, too fast” on green energy and is now focused on long-term shareholder value.
The company faces investor pressure, including from hedge fund Elliott Management, which has a $3.8 billion stake and may push for restructuring.

Key quote:

“Our optimism for a fast [energy] transition was misplaced, and we went too far, too fast.”

— Murray Auchincloss, CEO of BP

Why this matters:

For years, BP positioned itself as a leader among oil giants embracing the transition to renewable energy. But the company’s recent shift signals that high oil and gas prices — and the investor demand for returns — are proving difficult to resist. This could have long-lasting environmental consequences. Expanding fossil fuel production now could lock in decades of carbon emissions, making it harder to meet international climate targets.

At the same time, the renewables industry is growing, with solar and wind power continuing to gain market share. Some analysts suggest that BP’s retreat from green energy may be a financial gamble, potentially leaving the company vulnerable if the clean energy transition accelerates. The bigger question remains: As the world’s largest economies push forward with net-zero goals, will oil companies stay committed to their climate promises, or will short-term financial pressures continue to dictate their decisions?

www.theguardian.com

Credit: Jesse Schoff/Unsplash

A new wildlife assessment shows alarming declines and a few bright spots

An update to the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List, the global scientific authority on the status of species, underscores the immense challenges facing species in a world transformed by humans but also offer exciting new evidence of how the right interventions can help them survive.

Read the Full Article on

www.nytimes.com

BP shifts focus back to fossil fuels, slashing green investments

Researchers are reanimating 40,000-year-old microbes

A new wildlife assessment shows alarming declines and a few bright spots

'Not up for discussion': Brussels rejects Washington's pressure on climate rules

Senate nixes management plans to open access for fossil fuels

Inside Trump’s foray into mineral ownership

The hidden cost of ultra-processed foods on the environment: ‘The whole industry should pay’

This data scientist sees progress in the climate change fight

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.