
21 February 2024
Agents of Change: 2022-2023 Cohort
Read the ideas and solutions from our fourth cohort.
Read the ideas and solutions from our fourth cohort.
As the Trump administration slashes environmental oversight, local groups are battling state laws and tech industry deals that hide pollution data and energy demands.
In short:
Key quote:
“How many data centers currently exist in Virginia? How many proposals are in the works? These are good questions. It’s also extremely difficult to provide an answer, given there is no publicly available dataset or state-level tracking of these facilities.”
— The Piedmont Environmental Council, which attempts to track known data center projects in the state
Why this matters:
This is what environmental deregulation looks like in practice: a patchwork of laws that silence watchdogs and hide harm. While the federal government shrinks from its role, the fight for clean air and public data has become hyperlocal — and deeply unequal. Pollution data secrecy leaves families, first responders, and communities exposed to hidden environmental health risks, especially in frontline areas like Cancer Alley.
Read more:
The U.S. keeps recognizing the climate crisis but can't seem to commit to a plan that survives the next election.
Zack Colman, Benjamin Storrow, and Annie Snider report for Politico.
In short:
Key quote:
“Given what the science says about the need to act urgently, this will be a lost four years in the United States.”
— Joanne Spalding, legal director, Sierra Club
Why this matters:
Politics, not science, is stalling critical U.S. action on climate, and it's a race against time. Even modest emissions rules are now labeled extremist, fossil fuel lobbyists haunt the halls of Congress. Climate change isn’t waiting for bipartisan consensus. It's already showing up in the form of smoke-choked summers, vanishing coastlines, and illnesses driven by heat and pollution.
Read more:
In a move sure to inflame environmental tensions, Donald Trump has blocked California’s landmark plan to ban gas-powered car sales by 2035, setting up a legal clash over the state’s authority to fight air pollution.
In short:
Key quote:
“The federal government’s actions are not only unlawful; they’re irrational and wildly partisan. They come at the direct expense of the health and the wellbeing of our people.”
— Rob Bonta, California Attorney General
Why this matters:
California’s clean car rules aim to cut carbon and clean up the toxic tailpipe emissions that disproportionately choke low-income and minority communities near highways and freight corridors. California’s ready for a fight, and so are the dozen other states that follow its lead. But while the lawyers argue, the clock ticks on cleaner air and a livable climate.
President Trump announced plans to begin shutting down the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) after the 2025 hurricane season, raising concerns about how states will cope with mounting disaster costs.
In short:
Key quote:
“I was left with the impression that he doesn’t really understand the scale of what FEMA manages on a yearly basis with a budget of over $30 billion.”
— Michael Coen, FEMA chief of staff during the Obama and Biden administrations
Why this matters:
FEMA is the backbone of the nation’s disaster recovery system, moving billions in emergency aid each year to families, cities, and states facing hurricanes, wildfires, and other catastrophes. Dismantling it could leave vulnerable states — especially those with high disaster exposure and weak tax bases — without the resources to rebuild or prepare for the next emergency. Climate change is intensifying the frequency and cost of disasters, pushing the limits of local capacity. FEMA coordinates logistics, shelters, and emergency personnel across regions. Without that federal safety net, states could face slower, less equitable recoveries. Rural, low-income, and marginalized communities may be left behind if state budgets are overwhelmed or disaster declarations become less common. With local health systems already strained by budget cuts, the administration's move also poses a risk to public health.
Learn more: State and local emergency managers brace for less federal aid during disasters
A key federal climate education website may soon cease operations after the Trump administration terminated nearly all of its staff, raising fears the site could be shut down or repurposed.
In short:
Key quote:
“We operated exactly how you would want an independent, non-partisan communications group to operate.”
— Rebecca Lindsey, former program manager at Climate.gov
Why this matters:
Climate.gov was one of the federal government’s most trusted and widely accessed sources for scientifically grounded climate education. In an era of rising climate-driven disasters, public access to clear, factual climate data plays a vital role in helping communities prepare and respond. The loss of the Climate.gov team not only silences NOAA’s public education efforts, but also weakens the nation's defenses against misinformation. Many Americans, especially educators, local officials, and journalists, relied on the site’s tools and insights to interpret weather trends and long-term climate patterns like El Niño. Without a neutral government voice in this space, the vacuum may be filled by partisan groups, eroding public trust and blunting effective action on climate resilience and preparedness.
Read more: Climate data is vanishing from government websites, raising alarms
A new U.S. Environmental Protection Agency proposal dismisses the climate dangers of carbon emissions from power plants, drawing sharp criticism from scientists who say the claim defies decades of evidence.
In short:
Key quote:
“It is hard to imagine a decision dumber than putting the short-term interests of oil and gas companies ahead of the long-term interests of our children and grandchildren.”
— Chris Field, Stanford climate scientist
Why this matters:
Carbon dioxide emissions from power plants are a leading driver of climate change, and the United States plays a central role in both emissions and international efforts to reduce them. When government agencies reject established science, it can weaken global climate action, stall progress on clean energy, and fuel misinformation. Heat-trapping gases from burning coal, oil, and gas intensify extreme weather, raise sea levels, and endanger public health — especially in vulnerable communities. These emissions also contribute to dangerous air pollution, which harms lungs, hearts, and developing children. Disregarding the science in regulatory decisions can have lasting consequences for both public health and the planet’s stability.
Learn more: EPA repeal of limits on power plant emissions threatens key climate and health protections
A coordinated U.S. campaign led by MAGA-aligned groups and officials is pressuring the European Union to roll back climate and human rights regulations targeting large corporations.
In short:
Key quote:
“We have to be careful not to harm the cause by sticking our necks out and becoming a target in the U.S.”
— Anonymous sustainability expert at a financial firm
Why this matters:
The weakening of the EU’s climate due diligence law under pressure from U.S. political operatives highlights how climate denial and deregulation can leap borders. The CSDDD aimed to hold major corporations accountable for environmental and human rights harms throughout their global supply chains — a major step forward in corporate responsibility. But as U.S. institutions like the Heartland Institute escalate attacks on environmental, social, and governance principles, European leaders appear increasingly willing to bend. The coordinated backlash could slow progress on decarbonization and embolden corporations to delay or abandon sustainability goals, further endangering public health and environmental stability in a warming world.
Read more: Trump’s push to sway Europe on fossil fuels clashes with clean energy momentum
One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.
“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”
"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”
A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations
“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”
“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.