solar power africa

Coronavirus relief funds could easily pay to stop the worst of climate change while rebooting economies

Are governments and companies willing and able to turn toward a cleaner, more prosperous future to the benefit of all?

As of late summer, governments around the world had pledged US$12.2 trillion of relief in response to the coronavirus pandemic.


That's around 15 percent of global GDP, three times larger than government spending put forward during and after the 2008-2009 global financial crisis and enough for every adult in the world to receive a $2,000 check.

A good chunk of initial COVID-19 aid funding is being used – quite rightly – to support health care systems, preserve people's livelihoods and stabilize employment. But much is slated for investment into infrastructure and economies. Whether those are climate-friendly investments or not still remains to be seen.

While the world's bout with the virus is far from over, there is already talk amongst leaders like Joe Biden and Boris Johnson about rebuilding toward a more sustainable, more resilient future.

The global economic rebuild could include efforts to avoid the worst impacts of one of today's looming mega-threats: climate change.

Money needed to achieve climate goals

Moving toward a cleaner energy world is cheaper than many people perceive.

My work at the Electric Power Research Institute, University of Tennessee and with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change focuses on the costs and benefits of energy and climate decisions made by governments and companies.

According to research done by me and my colleagues, we estimate it would cost around $1.4 trillion per year over the next five years in clean-energy investment to meet the goals of the Paris climate agreement. This amount – if invested around the globe in things like solar and wind power, advanced power grids, carbon capture and storage, biofuels, electric vehicles, better insulated homes and other carbon-saving efforts – would start to bend the emissions curve, putting the world on a path to net-zero emissions by midcentury.

In other words, it is by no means impossible to hold global temperature rise to +1.5 C (2.7 F).

A lot is already being spent on climate initiatives

While $1.4 trillion per year sounds like a lot of money, it's actually not so much greater than what is already being spent on clean energy worldwide.

Countries are projected to invest an estimated $1.1 trillion per year over the next five years into low-carbon energy strategies. This pathway would take the world toward 3 degrees Celsius of warming, a level that could be quite harmful for the planet.

Much of this funding comes in response to national, state and local policy mandates and incentives. But a lot is happening thanks to pure economics as well: companies aiming to profit from new clean energy installations, which are becoming increasingly more affordable in many places.

Thus, taking into account the $1.1 trillion per year baked into the system already, the additional amount of clean energy investment needed to get on a 1.5 C track comes to just $0.3 trillion – or $300 billion – per year over the next five years.

For the entire globe, $300 billion per year over five years – or $1.5 trillion cumulative – is not an outrageous sum of money. It represents just one-eighth of the $12.2 trillion governments around the world have announced for COVID-19 relief to date.

Thus, a fraction of current bailout funding could provide the extra near-term boost the world needs to get on track to meet +2 or 1.5 C (+3.6 or 2.7 F) of warming, the levels countries committed to in the 2015 Paris climate agreement.

Change course, then move forward

President-elect Joe Biden is calling for some $1.7 trillion investment in clean energy and energy efficiency over the next 10 years. This level of investment, if also realized in other countries, could put the world on a path to meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement.

The U.S. has already committed trillions of dollars for COVID-19 relief, much of which is going toward important needs like patient care, vaccine research and direct economic bailouts. But economic recovery plans contain money for long-term economic growth, too. And that's the money I am suggesting could be directed toward climate-friendly investments.

Meeting the Paris goals will ultimately demand continued and increasing investments going forward, climbing above the $300 billion per year over the next five years that would get the world on track to 1.5 C (2.7 F). Nevertheless, an initial injection of funds into clean energy could achieve two goals: boost the global economy through large infrastructure spending and accelerate the deployment of clean energy production and energy efficiency measures.

Like with so many things, the question seems to be one of political will – are governments and companies willing and able to turn toward a cleaner, more prosperous future to the benefit of all?

Public funding appears to be available – for now – and given how massive this funding is, it provides a unique opportunity to catalyze the development, deployment and dissemination of clean technologies during the next decade, an absolutely critical period in the fight against climate change.The Conversation

David L. McCollum, is a Senior Research Scientist at the University of Tennessee

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Banner photo: The United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) inaugurating a new solar farm in February 2020. (Credit: UNMISS/flickr)

Oil well in silhouette with blue sky behind it.

Oil companies use legal loopholes to avoid well cleanup costs

The oil industry has created a "playbook" to avoid cleaning up old wells, leaving taxpayers to foot the bill as millions of wells across the U.S. leak pollutants.

Mark Olalde reports for ProPublica and Capital & Main.

Keep reading...Show less
Senator Whitehouse & climate change

Senator Whitehouse puts climate change on budget committee’s agenda

For more than a decade, Senator Sheldon Whitehouse gave daily warnings about the mounting threat of climate change. Now he has a powerful new perch.
A black-and-white photo of the Los Angeles skyline shrouded in pollution as viewed from nearby mountains.
Credit: Moritz Lino/Flickr

L.A. is rethinking its future with housing and transit reforms

Los Angeles is tackling decades of car-centric planning and restrictive zoning to address its worsening housing and traffic crises, with reforms that could serve as a blueprint for cities nationwide.

M. Nolan Gray reports for The Atlantic.

Keep reading...Show less
Pollution emissions billow from smokestacks along a body of water.
Credit: Linda in Fortuna/Flickr

Biden administration pauses air pollution rules as Trump transition looms

The Biden administration is holding firm on some critical air pollution protections while conceding delays on others, signaling a shift in priorities as Trump's presidency approaches.

Sean Reilly reports for Politico.

In short:

  • The EPA denied an industry coalition's request to roll back tougher safeguards against accidental toxic emissions from refineries and chemical plants.
  • However, the agency has withdrawn plans to expand smog control measures and tighten incinerator pollution standards, citing new litigation deadlines.
  • Finalizing these rules could take years, raising concerns about the health impacts of delayed action on pollutants affecting vulnerable communities.

Key quote:

“EPA will continue working on these Clean Air Act actions.”

— Nick Conger, EPA spokesperson

Why this matters:

Air pollution rules directly impact public health, especially in communities near industrial sites. Delays in implementing stricter standards leave residents exposed to harmful pollutants like mercury, lead and nitrogen oxides, which can cause respiratory issues and other long-term health risks. Communities already choking on polluted air — often low-income and minority neighborhoods — are left waiting for relief as litigation and bureaucratic hurdles drag timelines into the distant future.

Read more: Toxic air lingers in Texas Latino community, revealing failures in state’s air monitoring system.

kidney stones in children
Credit: megaflopp/BigStockPhoto ID: 454967829

Rising kidney stones in children linked to processed foods and climate shifts

A surprising surge in pediatric kidney stones is forcing doctors to confront dietary shifts, environmental factors and climate-related heat stress as potential culprits.

Sabrina Malhi reports for The Washington Post.

Keep reading...Show less
grid-scale battery storage
Credit: Radix Ground Screws/Flickr

Big batteries are cutting emissions and reshaping the grid

Large-scale battery storage is rising as a game-changer in the U.S. energy grid, reducing reliance on dirty "peaker" plants and extending the reach of clean energy.

Alexa St. John and Mary Katherine Wildeman report for the Associated Press.

Keep reading...Show less
Courtroom gavel with the scales of justice in the background

Trump faces obstacles in limiting lawsuits targeting fossil fuel industry

Donald Trump's plans to shield the fossil fuel industry from accountability lawsuits face significant legal and procedural hurdles, experts say.

Dharna Noor reports for The Guardian.

Keep reading...Show less
Closeup of wind turbine blades
Credit: Enrique/Pixabay

Wind energy jobs grow, but safety concerns rise

Wind energy workers are calling for stronger safety standards and better training to address risks such as falls, electrical hazards and fatigue amid rapid industry growth.

Brooke Larsen reports for High Country News.

Keep reading...Show less
From our Newsroom
Agents of Change in Environmental Justice logo

LISTEN: Reflections on the first five years of the Agents of Change program

The leadership team talks about what they’ve learned — and what lies ahead.

Resident speaks at an event about the Midwest hydrogen hub organized by Just Transition NWI.

What a Trump administration means for the federal hydrogen energy push

Legal and industry experts say there are uncertainties about the future of hydrogen hubs, a cornerstone of the Biden administration’s clean energy push.

unions climate justice

Op-ed: The common ground between labor and climate justice is the key to a livable future

The tale of “jobs versus the environment” does not capture the full story.

Union workers from SEIU holding climate protest signs at a rally in Washington DC

El terreno común entre los derechos laborales y la justicia climática es la clave de un futuro habitable

La narrativa de “empleos vs. proteger el medio ambiente” no cuenta la historia completa.

unions and labor movement

LISTEN: Pradnya Garud on the role of unions in climate justice

“They’ve been able to combine forces and really come forward to bring social and environmental change.”

Stay informed: sign up for The Daily Climate newsletter
Top news on climate impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered to your inbox week days.