EPA budget cuts may weaken wildfire smoke protections as air pollution worsens

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed budget cuts and restructuring could reduce air monitoring capacity and delay public health responses to increasingly toxic wildfire smoke across the U.S.

Izzy Ross and Matt Simon report for Grist.

In short:

The Trump administration plans to halve the EPA’s budget and eliminate thousands of positions, threatening the agency’s ability to monitor and respond to air pollution from wildfire smoke.
Wildfire smoke contains PM 2.5 and can chemically transform into more harmful substances like ozone; in some areas, it may carry heavy metals like arsenic from contaminated soils.
Federal monitors have played a crucial role in air quality forecasting; scientists warn that private and community sensors lack the precision to fully assess health risks without EPA infrastructure.

Key quote:

“In order to be able to better test these hypotheses, we need these federally funded monitors and networks and data. This is critical. Without that, it would be impossible to do this type of research and better understand what is going on.”

— Tarik Benmarhnia, professor of environmental epidemiology, Scripps Institution of Oceanography

Why this matters:

Wildfire smoke is becoming a primary source of air pollution across North America, and its reach extends far beyond burn zones. Fine particles in smoke, especially PM 2.5, can lodge deep in the lungs and bloodstream, aggravating asthma, heart disease, and other health conditions. With more fires ignited by climate-fueled heat and drought, even historically clean-air regions are facing hazardous smoke days. The data gathered by federal air quality monitors is essential for real-time alerts, long-term research, and regulatory action. Cutting these systems weakens national capacity to track pollution spikes, protect vulnerable communities, and prepare for a smoke-heavy future that increasingly threatens public health.

grist.org

EPA budget cuts may weaken wildfire smoke protections as air pollution worsens

What top climate scientists think of Trump’s treaty withdrawals

As Trump eyes Greenland, what could that mean for island’s mineral wealth and environment?

The impact of US withdrawal from global climate pacts

US exit of key UN climate treaty criticized as self-sabotage

US oil companies will be slow to answer Trump’s call to tap into Venezuela, experts say

‘Profound impacts’: Record ocean heat is intensifying climate disasters, data shows

Opinion: Climate misinformation threatens Canada’s national security

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.