EPA’s research office faces deep cuts, sparking alarm over environmental protections

The potential elimination of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Research and Development could result in mass layoffs of scientists and weaken the agency’s ability to assess and respond to environmental threats.

Aman Azhar reports for Inside Climate News.


In short:

  • Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, former EPA science official, warns that the proposed restructuring could eliminate up to 1,155 scientific positions and shutter key research facilities.
  • The Office of Research and Development plays a critical role in detecting pollutants, assessing toxic risks, and informing regulations with scientific research.
  • Orme-Zavaleta argues that gutting this office would set back scientific progress for decades, leaving emerging threats like PFAS and nanoplastics unchecked.

Key quote:

"It took decades to build it. It will take decades to rebuild it."

— Jennifer Orme-Zavaleta, former principal deputy assistant administrator, EPA Office of Research and Development

Why this matters:

The EPA relies on scientific research to set regulations that protect public health and the environment. Proposed budget cuts to its research division could weaken the agency’s ability to detect and respond to environmental hazards, from industrial chemicals to climate-related disasters. Without independent studies, regulations may become more reactive than preventive, potentially exposing communities to unregulated pollutants and slowing responses to crises like chemical spills and harmful algal blooms.

Supporters of the cuts argue that regulatory decisions should lean more on industry-led research or state-level initiatives, while critics warn that weakening federal research could lead to regulatory capture, where industries influence policies in their favor. With climate-related disasters on the rise and concerns over water and air quality persisting, experts caution that reducing the EPA’s scientific capacity could leave the country less prepared to address emerging environmental threats.

Read more: Trump administration moves to dismantle EPA’s science office

A view of the tops of wheat stalks in a field

Drought-hit Britain heads for worst cereal harvest in four decades

Britain's cereal harvest is on track to be the worst since comparable records began in 1984, as crops wither after one of the driest and hottest spring-summer periods on record.

A word cloud with the word Misinformation among other vocabulary

With AI slop, wildfire misinformation is mutating online

How conspiracy theories, misinformation and AI-generated images anchored by social media engagement are playing out during Canada’s 2026 wildfires
A firetruck pulling up to a house on fire

Editorial: Blaming environmentalism is convenient for those who failed to see the climate crisis coming

The anger and frustration expressed over the destruction caused by wildfires and other climate disasters are legitimate, yet these emotions should be directed at the lack of sufficient collective action, not used to rewrite what happened.

A woman walking in a field with a group of sheep

How regenerative farmers are shielding Spanish land from wildfires

Europe’s regenerative farmers are providing vital wildfire protection — but they need more support.

A woman using a blue fan to try to cool herself off

Scientists say global warming is making summer miserable, but soon El Niño will add to the heat

With parts of the globe aflame in wildfires, deadly heat waves parking over cities, record hot oceans and a strengthening super El Niño, it seems like we’re baking through the hottest year on record.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sign at the headquarters building in Washington, DC.
Credit: marcnorman/BigStock Photo ID: 21123533

Court rules against Trump EPA’s freeze of $20B in ​‘green bank’ funds

A federal appeals court finds the U.S. EPA acted improperly in terminating grants to boost clean energy projects. The Trump administration may appeal to the Supreme Court.

Supreme Court of the United States located in Washington DC

Supreme Court sets date for blockbuster climate case

Suncor v. Boulder could determine the fate of dozens of lawsuits filed by cities, counties, and states against oil and gas companies.

From our Newsroom
Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro speaks with the state flag and American flag behind him.

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

silhouette of people holding hands by a lake at sunset

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

wildfire retardants being sprayed by plane

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.

Stay informed: sign up for The Daily Climate newsletter
Top news on climate impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered to your inbox week days.