European green-labeled funds invested billions in oil and gas giants despite climate pledges

European investment funds marketed as sustainable held more than $33 billion in fossil fuel company shares as of late 2024, raising concerns about greenwashing and regulatory loopholes.

Damian Carrington, Giorgio Michalopoulos and Stefano Valentino report for The Guardian.

In short:

More than 480 European “green” funds governed by the EU’s sustainable finance disclosure regulations (SFDR) regulations collectively held $33.5 billion in fossil fuel stocks, including stakes in ExxonMobil, Shell, BP, Chevron, and TotalEnergies.
Fund managers, including BlackRock, JP Morgan, and DWS, argue these investments enable shareholder influence over fossil companies, though climate analysts say the companies are not aligned with Paris climate agreement targets.
Upcoming European Securities and Markets Authority guidelines — set to take effect May 21— will allow regulators to hold funds accountable for the use of sustainability-related labels, though the rules are not legally binding.

Key quote:

“It is diabolical for banks and asset managers to invest billions in major fossil fuel companies under the rubric of ‘green investing’ when we need to accelerate investments in non- and low-carbon energy, in carbon efficiency, and in carbon removal technologies.”

— Richard Heede, Climate Accountability Institute

Why this matters:

The term “green investing” carries a promise: that your money supports environmental progress. But when so-called sustainable funds funnel billions into oil giants, that promise is broken. Funds operating under vague or loosely enforced definitions of sustainability risk misleading individuals, institutions, and governments alike. While regulators have begun to react — tightening rules around fund naming and disclosure — investors may still find themselves funding fossil fuel expansion through portfolios meant to fight climate change.

www.theguardian.com

Credit: Jesse Schoff/Unsplash

A new wildlife assessment shows alarming declines and a few bright spots

An update to the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List, the global scientific authority on the status of species, underscores the immense challenges facing species in a world transformed by humans but also offer exciting new evidence of how the right interventions can help them survive.

Read the Full Article on

www.nytimes.com

European green-labeled funds invested billions in oil and gas giants despite climate pledges

Researchers are reanimating 40,000-year-old microbes

A new wildlife assessment shows alarming declines and a few bright spots

'Not up for discussion': Brussels rejects Washington's pressure on climate rules

Senate nixes management plans to open access for fossil fuels

Inside Trump’s foray into mineral ownership

The hidden cost of ultra-processed foods on the environment: ‘The whole industry should pay’

This data scientist sees progress in the climate change fight

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.