A man in a yellow high visibility vest standing on a roof with solar panels with skyscrapers in background.

Fossil fuel advocate shapes Republican push to cut renewable energy funding

A fossil fuel promoter who advises GOP lawmakers is pushing Congress to gut renewable tax credits, influencing the Republican megabill backed by the Trump administration.

Robin Bravender and Timothy Cama report for E&E News.

In short:

Alex Epstein, founder of a fossil fuel advocacy group, played a behind-the-scenes role in Republican negotiations over a sweeping budget package by urging lawmakers to eliminate renewable energy tax credits sooner than originally planned.
His influence helped shift House legislation to cut off clean energy tax breaks 60 days after enactment, instead of allowing them to continue through 2031 under the Inflation Reduction Act.
Epstein is now working to convince Senate Republicans to go further by ending all subsidies for wind and solar projects, arguing that these incentives undermine the electric grid.

Key quote:

“What I was arguing for very strongly is at minimum, you have to get rid of the new subsidies, and you absolutely have to have them all expire and stop under Trump’s term.”

— Alex Epstein, founder of the Center for Industrial Progress

Why this matters:

The future of U.S. clean energy development is being redrawn as political forces push to unwind landmark climate investments. Subsidies for wind and solar have driven historic growth in renewable energy, often benefiting conservative rural districts with new jobs and infrastructure. Rolling back those incentives risks stalling or reversing this momentum just as the grid faces escalating demands from extreme weather and electrification. Advocates warn that yanking support for renewables means increasing dependency on volatile fossil fuel markets and delaying the transition to cleaner, more stable energy systems. Meanwhile, fossil fuel proponents argue the grid can't reliably run on intermittent sources and that market forces should dictate energy choices. With Congress debating the terms of energy support, these policy shifts could reshape emissions, energy access, and investment for decades.

Learn more: Clean energy rollback plan could threaten U.S. power reliability, industry warns

www.eenews.net

Fossil fuel advocate shapes Republican push to cut renewable energy funding

Trump energy chief’s review of climate reports sparks backlash from scientists

DHS reassigns FEMA workers to immigration hiring push as hurricane season peaks

Plastic treaty talks face mounting industry influence as nations split on production cuts

EPA plan could strip authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from factory farms

EU’s plan to buy foreign carbon cuts moves forward without impact study

Trump administration moves to replace senior official at global energy agency

Fracking lawsuit in West Virginia alleges toxic exposure sickened children

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.