Fossil fuel industry seeks legal shield from climate lawsuits

Nearly 200 environmental and legal groups are urging Congress to reject any efforts by the fossil fuel industry to secure immunity from lawsuits over climate-related damages.

Dharna Noor reports for The Guardian.

In short:

Advocacy groups, including the Sierra Club and Earthjustice, warn that the fossil fuel industry may leverage the Trump administration’s policies to push for legal immunity from climate lawsuits.
Oil companies have faced over 30 lawsuits from states and cities accusing them of concealing the climate risks of their products, with some cases seeking billions in damages.
Concerns are growing that the industry could seek a liability waiver, similar to the one granted to the firearms industry, to block both existing and future climate litigation.

Key quote:

“What’s at stake here isn’t just who pays for climate disasters. It’s whether our democracy allows powerful industries to simply rewrite the rules when justice catches up to them.”

— Cassidy DiPaola, Make Polluters Pay

Why this matters:

For decades, oil and gas giants have been accused of misleading the public about the dangers of burning fossil fuels, despite knowing the risks of global warming as early as the 1960s. Now, a wave of lawsuits aims to hold these companies accountable for their role in intensifying extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and other environmental damages.

It's not just about financial restitution, but the broader question of corporate responsibility. If the industry secures immunity — whether through legal defenses, lobbying efforts, or political intervention — it could set a precedent that shields polluters from similar lawsuits in the future. That, in turn, could leave taxpayers footing the bill for the mounting costs of climate disasters, from wildfire recovery to infrastructure repairs after hurricanes and floods.

Learn more: Fossil fuel industry ramps up political spending as investigations stall

www.theguardian.com

electric vehicle EV charging at a charging station.

Credit: Haberdoedas/Unsplash

New Trump administration rule weakens efforts to promote cleaner cars

The Trump administration just threw a wrench into Biden’s fuel efficiency plans, publishing a new rule that challenges how electric vehicles factor into federal standards.

Rachel Frazin reports for The Hill.

In short:

The U.S. Transportation Department issued a rule saying the Biden administration improperly used electric vehicles to calculate carmakers’ fuel economy standards.
While not eliminating Biden’s rules outright, the administration suggested it may not enforce them during its own rulemaking process, arguing the current standards are akin to an EV mandate.
The move undercuts one of Biden’s core climate strategies and could reduce pressure on automakers to improve efficiency — unless U.S. Environmental Protection Agency rules, which Republicans are also trying to reverse, stay intact.

Why this matters:

Fuel efficiency rules are one of the federal government’s main tools to cut transportation emissions — the top source of greenhouse gases in the U.S. While this new rule doesn’t outright kill the fuel economy standards, it signals the administration likely won’t enforce them while it writes its own version.

Read the Full Article on

thehill.com

Fossil fuel industry seeks legal shield from climate lawsuits

Scientists call on UN to adopt bold ocean policies to combat climate and biodiversity threats

EU ocean protection plan draws fire for weak enforcement and lack of binding goals

Wildfire smoke from Canada continues to choke U.S. cities as climate patterns worsen

EPA rollback plan threatens billions in savings and thousands of lives, analysis shows

New Trump administration rule weakens efforts to promote cleaner cars

Move to revoke California EV rules threatens state authority on clean air

Repealing clean energy incentives could cost families hundreds more in utility bills

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.