Future fossil fuel project impacts must be considered, UK court rules

The UK Supreme Court has ruled that the environmental impact of burning fossil fuels must be included in the planning process for new projects.

Isabella Kaminski reports for The Guardian.

In short:

The ruling mandates that planning authorities must consider the greenhouse gas emissions from burning extracted fossil fuels.
The case, initiated by Sarah Finch, challenged Surrey county council's approval of an oil drilling project without assessing downstream emissions.
This decision could influence other legal challenges against fossil fuel projects in the UK.

Key quote:

"The whole purpose of extracting fossil fuels is to make hydrocarbons available for combustion. It can therefore be said with virtual certainty that, once oil has been extracted from the ground, the carbon contained within it will sooner or later be released into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide and so will contribute to global warming."

— UK Supreme Court Judges

Why this matters:

This ruling ensures that the long-term climate impacts of fossil fuel projects are considered, potentially leading to stricter scrutiny and fewer approvals for new fossil fuel extraction projects. It represents a significant step in addressing climate change at the policy level.

www.theguardian.com

Future fossil fuel project impacts must be considered, UK court rules

Caribbean reefs have lost 48% of hard coral since 1980, study finds

Climate complacency is a worry, says UN environment head

UN says world must jointly tackle issues of climate change, pollution, biodiversity and land loss

States push to end secrecy over data center water use

‘It’s not safe to live here.’ Colombia is deadliest country for environmental defenders

Data centers for AI could nearly triple San Jose’s energy use. Who foots the bill?

Nowhere to move: How climate change became the property market’s biggest nightmare

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.