Greenpeace challenges U.S. pipeline company’s lawsuit in Dutch court

Greenpeace has filed a case in the Netherlands against U.S. energy company Energy Transfer, arguing its $300 million lawsuit over the 2016 Dakota Access Pipeline protests is an attempt to silence activism.

Molly Quell reports for The Associated Press.

In short:

Greenpeace is using a new European Union rule against SLAPP lawsuits, which aim to intimidate activists and civil society groups.
Energy Transfer sued Greenpeace in North Dakota, blaming it for protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline, which Indigenous groups and environmentalists opposed due to oil spill risks.
Greenpeace seeks damages and a court declaration that the lawsuit is a SLAPP, which could prevent enforcement in the EU.

Key quote:

“Greenpeace is fighting off a devastating lawsuit that is aimed at preventing us and other civil society organizations from doing their work.”

— Daniel Simons, Greenpeace legal counsel

Why this matters:

Strategic lawsuits against public participation, or SLAPP suits, have long been used to silence critics by dragging them into costly and time-consuming legal battles. Typically filed by corporations, politicians or other powerful entities, these cases don’t necessarily aim to win in court but to exhaust the resources of advocacy groups, journalists or activists who challenge them. Environmental organizations are frequent targets, especially when they take on industries tied to deforestation, fossil fuels or pollution.

apnews.com

Greenpeace challenges U.S. pipeline company’s lawsuit in Dutch court

Clothes that cool you, warm you — and make power as you move

Gas from thawing Arctic permafrost is changing world's climate future

‘Explosion of melt rates’: 20% of Swiss glaciers lost in five years

Climate change’s compounding pressures on rural North Carolina

The true cost of Trump's fuel economy rollbacks

Montana officials praise repeal of power plant emission regulations, watchdog groups pan decision

The surprising allies backing Boulder's climate case before the Supreme Court

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.