Greenpeace faces tough legal battle over Dakota Access Pipeline protests

Greenpeace is fighting a multimillion-dollar lawsuit from Energy Transfer, which claims the environmental group played a major role in protests that delayed construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.

Karen Zraick reports for The New York Times.

In short:

Greenpeace asked North Dakota’s Supreme Court to move the trial out of Morton County, arguing the jury is biased due to the pipeline protests that disrupted local life in 2016-2017.
Energy Transfer accuses Greenpeace of defamation, inciting violence, and supporting protest tactics that damaged equipment and delayed construction.
If Greenpeace loses, the judgment could total hundreds of millions of dollars, potentially forcing the group to shut down U.S. operations.

Key quote:

“With jury selection complete, it is clearer now than ever that Greenpeace defendants will not get a fair and impartial trial in the county where the protests occurred.”

— Greenpeace legal filing

Why this matters:

The case tests how far companies can go in suing advocacy groups over protests. Energy Transfer's lawsuit follows a broader trend of corporations using legal action to target activists, potentially chilling environmental and social movements. The Dakota Access Pipeline protests centered on Native American land rights and water protection, issues still at the forefront of environmental justice debates. A ruling against Greenpeace could have lasting effects on how advocacy groups operate in the U.S.

www.nytimes.com

Greenpeace faces tough legal battle over Dakota Access Pipeline protests

Plans to dispose of mining waste in Norway’s Arctic Ocean worries Sámi fishers, herders

The next deluge may go differently

The hidden devastation of hurricanes

The last frontier of empathy: why we still struggle to see ourselves as animals

Opinion: How a Texas shrimper stalled Exxon’s $10bn plastics plant

Two ways of knowing: How merging science and Indigenous wisdom fuels new discoveries

Is ‘imagination activism’ the antidote to climate doom we’ve been looking for?

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.