Harris stays vague on her energy policies ahead of the election

Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential nominee, supports clean energy and reducing emissions but has avoided taking detailed positions on energy issues with two months left in the race.

Brian Dabbs reports for E&E News.

In short:

Harris supports cutting pollution and clean energy investments but has not endorsed specific proposals like a drilling phaseout or a faster shift to 100% clean electricity.
Environmentalists are divided on whether her broad statements on climate change will mobilize voters, especially among the younger generation.
The fossil fuel industry seeks more clarity from Harris, urging her to define her stance on energy security and inflation.

Key quote:

“We want to be able to sell that to our base. We want to be able to push for the climate agenda that we know that we need.”

— Collin Rees, campaign manager at Oil Change U.S.

Why this matters:

Harris’ general approach on energy could influence key voter blocs. Her reluctance to dive into detailed policies risks alienating both climate advocates and younger voters, a demographic critical for Democratic success.

Additional coverage:

www.eenews.net

Harris stays vague on her energy policies ahead of the election

Trump leaves wind industry reeling — at a perilous moment for his party

Opinion: Trump’s shuttering of the National Center for Atmospheric Research is Stalinist: Michael Mann and Bob Ward

Oil, gold and rare earth elements: the backdrop to US political tension with Venezuela

The Pentagon and A.I. giants have a weakness. Both need China’s batteries, badly.

Electrifying these factories could cut a gigaton of CO2 pollution

‘Bonkers’: DOI letter halts all five in-progress offshore wind farms

The Doomsday Glacier is getting closer and closer to irreversible collapse

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.