Judge's sanctions against Michael Mann revive battle over climate defamation case

A Washington, D.C., judge accused climate scientist Michael Mann and his legal team of misconduct during a defamation trial, reigniting a legal fight that has spanned over a decade.

DeSmog reports.


In short:

  • In 2024, Michael Mann won a $1 million jury verdict in a defamation case against two bloggers, but Judge Alfred Irving later reduced the award to $5,000 and imposed sanctions against Mann’s legal team.
  • The judge claimed Mann’s lawyers intentionally misled the court about research grant data, though the team insists the discrepancies were acknowledged and corrected before trial.
  • Mann’s lawyers are asking the court to reverse the misconduct ruling, while critics link the judge’s stance to a broader political trend undermining climate science.

Key quote:

“The current Trump administration is engaging in an aggressive effort to defund and marginalize climate science. In this atmosphere, attacks on climate science and scientists have increased.”

— Robert Brulle, professor of climate science and society at Brown University

Why this matters:

This case reflects the precarious position of climate scientists in the United States, where legal and political forces often shape public understanding of science. Lawsuits like this one have become a battleground over the legitimacy of climate research, especially when scientists challenge powerful industries or ideologies. When courts penalize researchers for procedural missteps — even ones acknowledged and corrected — it sends a signal that speaking out carries serious professional and financial risks. Judge Alfred Irving’s decision to slash damages and accuse Mann’s team of misconduct could embolden those who seek to discredit scientists through litigation rather than scientific debate. At a time when the Trump administration is scaling back climate programs and rolling back environmental rules, these rulings echo a broader push to marginalize and stifle climate expertise.

Related:

A dry scrubby environment with snow-capped mountains in the background

Conservationists worry a Trump re-do will imperil Wyoming's climate-stressed Red Desert

Conservationists warn that a pending amendment to the Bureau of Land Management’s Rock Springs plan could open previously protected stretches of Wyoming’s Red Desert to drilling, placing an already climate-stressed ecosystem and critical wildlife habitat at further risk.

A view of tall mountains with water and a tugboat in the foreground

The climate costs of B.C.’s Ksi Lisims LNG

The newly approved Ksi Lisims LNG facility in northern B.C. is being celebrated as a clean energy project, but documents show it will rely on gas-fired power until hydroelectricity can reach the site — potentially not until 2032.

A lime green hat hanging on the underside of solar panels

The politics of renewables are getting stranger. ‘Sun Day’ celebrates them anyway

A new national day of action, Sun Day, will spotlight the progress of solar, wind, and battery power while confronting the growing political polarization around renewable energy.

An illustration of a map of Europe, with members of the EU shown in blue

Exxon seeks US political help in call to quash EU climate law

Exxon Mobil is stepping up attacks against a European Union corporate sustainability law and has taken its concerns directly to U.S. President Donald Trump, warning that the regulation will lead to more businesses leaving Europe.
A worker installing an induction cooktop on a kitchen counter

The joy (and huge health benefits) of induction cooking

From Portland taprooms to Michelin-starred kitchens, more cooks are switching to induction stovetops, citing their efficiency, comfort, and safety. The move also reduces harmful indoor air pollution and cuts greenhouse gas emissions tied to gas cooking.

Tearful woman seemingly leaving job and carrying contents of her office

Fearing retaliation, scientists are struggling to share impacts of federal cuts

The Trump administration retaliated against scientists who stepped forward publicly to express concerns over federal policies. But many are still sharing their fears anonymously.
A factory or power plant with smokestacks emitting pollution
Credit: Faux Toe/Big Stock Photo

Top scientists find growing evidence that greenhouse gases are, in fact, a danger

The assessment contradicts the Trump administration’s legal arguments for relaxing pollution rules.
From our Newsroom
Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro speaks with the state flag and American flag behind him.

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

silhouette of people holding hands by a lake at sunset

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

wildfire retardants being sprayed by plane

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.

Stay informed: sign up for The Daily Climate newsletter
Top news on climate impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered to your inbox week days.