Judges' interpretations of the law significantly impact climate policy

Presidential environmental regulations often face court challenges, shaping policies on climate, water, air, and wildlife.

Nathan Rott reports for NPR.

In short:

• Environmental rules, regardless of the president, are frequently challenged in court.
• Lower federal courts, where thousands of decisions are made, often have the final say.
• Recent judicial appointments have emphasized partisan alignment over experience, affecting court decisions on environmental issues.

Key quote:

“I do think we need a Supreme Court, appellate courts, trial courts, that respect the law and respect facts and avoid this kind of activist bent.”

— DJ Gerken, president of the Southern Environmental Law Center

Why this matters:

Judges' rulings shape the effectiveness of environmental regulations, impacting the government's ability to address critical climate issues. Increased judicial skepticism can undermine efforts to manage emerging environmental challenges.