Leonard Leo’s group criticizes efforts to educate judges on climate issues

A rightwing think tank tied to Leonard Leo is accusing a nonprofit’s climate change seminars for judges of unfairly influencing the judiciary to favor climate lawsuits.

Dharna Noor and Alice Herman report for The Guardian.

In short:

The Environmental Law Institute’s (ELI) Climate Judiciary Project offers neutral education to judges on climate science for use in related litigation.
The American Energy Institute (AEI), a pro-fossil fuel think tank, alleges that the program unfairly supports plaintiffs in climate cases, releasing a report claiming bias.
AEI’s report was edited and promoted by CRC Advisors, a PR firm chaired by Leonard Leo, known for shaping the conservative US judiciary.

Key quote:

"ELI’s seminars are giving judges the ABCs of climate change, which is a complicated subject that they ought to know about."

— Kert Davies, director of special investigations at the Center for Climate Integrity

Why this matters:

Climate-related litigation could hold fossil fuel companies accountable for their role in the climate crisis. Efforts to educate judges about climate science may be key to ensuring fair and informed legal outcomes in these cases.

www.theguardian.com

Leonard Leo’s group criticizes efforts to educate judges on climate issues

Data center opposition giving environmental groups momentum

Opinion: Amendment 82 is a dark-money attack on Colorado’s clean energy leadership

In Texas senate race, Talarico and Paxton both promise relief from rising energy costs

This overlooked election could shape California’s climate future

The EPA is about to hand oil and gas companies a huge methane-related gift

What finance can tell us about the ‘twin crises’ of climate change and biodiversity loss

Climate change is putting Europe’s brain health at risk

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.