Montana's climate case draws industry support for the state's stance

Montana's high court is reviewing an appeal in the youth climate lawsuit, Held v. Montana, with significant backing from Republican leaders and business groups.

Blair Miller reports for the Daily Montanan.

In short:

Republican leaders and various organizations argue against the district court's decision, emphasizing the lack of direct injury to the youth plaintiffs and questioning the judicial interpretation of environmental policy.
The dispute centers on whether state law should require analysis of greenhouse gas emissions for environmental reviews, a requirement challenged by recent legislative amendments.
The case highlights a broader debate on the balance between environmental protection and legislative authority, with implications for business interests and energy policy.

Key quote:

"The Legislature is the only branch of government designed to take input from all stakeholders and make those policies on behalf of the citizens of Montana."

— Senate president Jason Ellsworth, R-Hamilton

Why this matters:

This legal battle is a microcosm of the national debate on how to balance climate action with energy needs and economic growth, stressing the importance of judicial and legislative roles in shaping environmental policy.

Watch: Youth v. Montana — Young adults speak up

www.ehn.org

Montana's climate case draws industry support for the state's stance

Data centers for AI could nearly triple San Jose’s energy use. Who foots the bill?

Nowhere to move: How climate change became the property market’s biggest nightmare

Extreme heat hampers children’s early learning

AI data center backlash: Public opposition to new projects is growing

As NOAA funding lags, a critical ocean weather system nears a breaking point

EU to ‘push back petrol car sales ban to 2040’

Dodging icebergs and storms on the hunt for an ocean tipping point

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.