Peter Dykstra: Waiting for two shoes to drop

Peter Dykstra: Waiting for two shoes to drop

A year of hurricanes, wildfires, and a bombshell climate report has hardly budged two key groups.

Let's start with a multiple choice: If we were to turn the clock back 30 years, which of these two things did you think would happen, and which two did you think would not?


  1. The Chicago Cubs would win their first World Series in a century, and the Boston Red Sox would win four.
  2. A bombastic, controversial real estate magnate named Donald Trump would get elected President. Of the United States.
  3. All corners of a strong, diligent national media would process an avalanche of science data and recognize climate change as a global crisis.
  4. The durable core of ideologues and coal-burning politicians would give up the ghost on the flimsy talking points of climate denial.

Back in 1988, when we gave a landslide victory to a Republican who vowed to be "the environmental president," concerted action on climate change seemed right around the corner. The late George H.W. Bush also said "Those who think we are powerless to do anything about the greenhouse effect forget about the 'White House effect.'"

Of course, those were only campaign promises. The national media's response to climate crises present and future has been mixed at best, and the willingness of Republicans remains nearly monolithic in failing to acknowledge even the possibility of a problem.

As for the multiple choice, we now know that the unlikely success of the Cubs, Red Sox and Trump are real. The climate reckoning of news media and political conservatives are not.

The liberal media watchdog group Media Matters for America tracked how often national newscasts connected the dots between climate change and the monstrous California wildfires earlier this month, concluding that ABC, NBC and CBS "dropped the ball" on mentioning climate change's impact. The left-leaning nonprofit gave more credit to local California news outlets for making the link.

Hurricanes Florence and Michael saw similar criticism of the networks and their cable competitors. Meanwhile, hardy perennial deniers like Rush Limbaugh offered their own Category Five spin on the storms: "For those of you asking, "What's the politics of a hurricane?" Climate change is the politics of a hurricane. And the forecast and the destruction potential doom and gloom is all to heighten the belief in climate change."

Limbaugh and his conservative cohorts have invested decades of gab into long-discredited denial memes. When the White House released, then dissed, the National Climate Assessment this past week, the most popular theme seemed to be that climate scientists are only in it for the money.

CNN had no less than three high profile deniers trot this one out: Two of its paid conservative pundits, former Senator Rick Santorum and economist Steven Moore, dove right in, joining Tom DeLay, the disgraced former House Majority Leader and ex-con.

And Fox News? Ever the denier-friendly network, Fox was also outed this week by The Daily Beast for staging an interview with then-EPA boss Scott Pruitt in which EPA staff helped fashion questions for the Fox & Friends morning show, teeing up Pruitt's answers and even scripting an intro for the segment.

Exceptions to the broadcast rule

MSNBC, true to its liberal brand, has skewered the Trump Administration's reflexive climate denial. CNN's John Avlon, too, has done a few particularly strong "Reality Check" segments.

But sadly and once again, the late night comics and satire shows have outperformed their straight-faced counterparts, including this Q&A with The Daily Show's Trevor Noah and former Vice President Al Gore.

Newspapers outperform cable news

Print-based institutions like the Washington Post and New York Times have staffed up and performed admirably. The Times splashed its coverage of the National Climate Assessment over the entire top half of its front page. Non-broadcasters, including the Associated Press, have been far less shy about making the climate-extreme weather link.

The Times also fact-checked the wealthy climate scientist fantasy.

Nonprofits, including those dedicated solely to reporting on climate and environment, have performed well, though generally to an audience that's already well aware of the problem.

Party of denial 

Asked about the stark verdict of his government's National Climate Assessment, President Trump could only offer a dog-ate-my-homework answer: "I've seen it, I've read part of it, and it's fine." Dude, really? I seriously doubt you've read the Executive Summary. Or even the cover.

This came only days after the now-obligatory Presidential tweet that an unusually cold Thanksgiving on the U.S. East Coast could only be regarded as the ultimate refutation of all climate science.

Staunch climate deniers like Ted Cruz were returned to the Senate. Marsha Blackburn, the Tennessee congresswoman perhaps best known for her jihad against more efficient lighting, was elevated from House to Senate. Florida Governor Rick Scott won a tight Senate race despite his consistent climate denial.

Dana Rohrabacher, a 15-term Representative from Southern California and Deputy Chair of the House Science Committee, lost, with his climate denial a likely factor. But there are few other glimmers among Republican incumbents that hostility to climate science won't be a pillar of the party.

A few conservative pundits and think tankers have taken the plunge.

Max Boot, who recently left his longtime perch on the Wall Street Journal editorial page, recently outed himself in a Washington Post op-ed. And Jerry Taylor, a longtime go-to guy for libertarian skeptics in Washington, is opening some eyes with a newfound acknowledgement that we have a potentially existential problem. S.E. Cupp, a conservative CNN pundit and New York Daily News columnist, broke with orthodoxy this week with a piece calling on her right-wing compadres to give up the "conservative climate delusion."

Despite a few cracks in the climate ceiling, we have a President, Cabinet, and political party who still don't see a downside to denying climate change. And a media too timid to treat the issue with the same urgency that they devote to missing cheerleaders.

We don't have the many years it could take to change this.

Climate change fueled $329 bln in 2021 economic losses

Climate change fueled $329 bln in 2021 economic losses, 3rd costliest year ever

The world racked up $329 billion in economic losses linked to severe weather last year, and only 38% of that bill was covered by insurance, Aon says.
Sunrise in the woods

Get our Good News newsletter

Get the best positive, solutions-oriented stories we've seen on the intersection of our health and environment, FREE every Tuesday in your inbox. Subscribe here today. Keep the change tomorrow.

Environmental law explained: How to stop climate change using the law

Gluing yourself to the road is one way to protest environmental collapse. Suing fossil fuel companies is another.
climate civil disobedience
Photo by Ma Ti on Unsplash

Interest in civil disobedience has reached a mini climate tipping point

As each hellish new natural disaster is matched by an equally hellish political stalemate on climate legislation, a growing segment of the American population is thinking: What can I personally do to get some climate action going here?

climate media action Justin McBrien
Photo by Bryan Goff on Unsplash

Justin McBrien: Disaster flicks like ‘Don’t Look Up’ won’t spur climate change action. Here’s why

The climate crisis is very different from an errant asteroid. Stopping it demands far more than listening to scientists and trusting their technical solutions.

Judges appear skeptical of Big Oil's climate claims
Photo by Robert Linder on Unsplash

Judges appear skeptical of Big Oil's climate claims

A panel of judges appeared skeptical yesterday of giving federal courts exclusive rights to hear climate change cases against fossil fuel firms.

children climate books
Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

New children’s book explains systemic nature of climate change

Most kids’ books about the environment encourage children to adopt Earth-friendly habits like taking shorter showers and recycling. But in a new release called “A Kids Book About Climate Change,” the authors focus on the bigger picture.

From our Newsroom
Africa cooking pollution

What do new cookstoves in Ghana and air conditioners in NYC have in common? Energy justice.

Combating energy poverty and energy insecurity are critical elements to achieving environmental health equity for billions worldwide.

dr. fauci

Peter Dykstra: Life imitates climate politics—again.

Personal, misinformed attacks on Dr. Fauci are reminiscent of climate spats over the decades.

Don't look up climate change

Hollywood’s third strike on climate change?

"Don't Look Up" is ambitious—but trips over its subject matter.

environmental news

5 popular reads from our newsroom in 2021

Check out what sparked readers' interest over the past year.

journalism

Our top 5 long reads of 2021

Check out must-read, in-depth reporting from the past year.

butterfly

Our top 5 good news stories of 2021

It's not all doom and gloom.

Stay informed: sign up for The Daily Climate newsletter
Top news on climate impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered to your inbox week days.