Philippines' climate-resilient city faces hurdles of equity and sustainability

New Clark City, a $2.5 billion development north of Manila, aims to be a climate-proof metropolis but faces concerns over displaced Indigenous communities, economic inequality and dependence on fossil fuels.

Maggie Wang reports for Grist.

In short:

New Clark City is designed to be a backup capital, built inland to avoid flooding and typhoons that threaten Manila.
Critics argue the project may displace and 65,000 people — including 18,000 Indigenous Ayta people — without proper compensation or consent.
Despite sustainability claims, the city may struggle with limited affordable housing and reliance on fossil fuels.

Key quote:

“When you start building a new community, you alter the topography of the area, and therefore you also alter the way water flows.”

— Harold Aquino, civil engineer and disaster resilience researchers at Massey University of New Zealand

Why this matters:

Climate-resilient cities could protect vulnerable populations, but without inclusive planning, they risk deepening social inequalities and environmental harm. New Clark City is looking to find a balance between infrastructure resilience, cultural preservation and economic accessibility to serve all residents, not just the affluent.

grist.org

Philippines' climate-resilient city faces hurdles of equity and sustainability

Meet the Bavarian hop farmer securing his harvest and income with solar 'hats'

Big Tech’s data center boom poised to drive up carbon emissions

South Africa’s top court blocks Shell oil exploration off country’s Wild Coast

Record-early champagne harvest highlights climate change impact on French vineyards

Congress may kill the federal heat rule before OSHA can

China’s leftover renewable energy could power UK for more than a year

Rare hammerhead discovery suggests climate change could be reshaping shark habitats

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.