Presidential candidates' policies on climate offer starkly different paths

Voters in the upcoming Harris-Trump election face a clear choice on climate policy, with Vice President Kamala Harris focusing on climate action and former President Donald Trump advocating fossil fuel expansion.

Gautama Mehta reports for Grist.

In short:

Harris supports the Inflation Reduction Act, which offers rebates for energy-efficient home improvements, while Trump has pledged to rescind it.
Trump's climate approach includes cutting regulations and increasing fossil fuel production, while Harris is expected to continue Biden's strategy of incentives for clean energy.
Both candidates' policies will impact electric vehicles, transportation and energy production, shaping how the U.S. meets climate goals.

Key quote:

“There are fundamental forces here at work. At the end of the day, there’s very little that Trump can do to stand in the way.”

— Gernot Wagner, climate economist at Columbia Business School

Why this matters:

The next U.S. president will influence policies related to energy, transportation and emissions, affecting the nation’s ability to meet critical climate targets. Their decisions will have long-term consequences for public health and the environment.

Presidential candidates' policies on climate offer starkly different paths

Trump officials to slash public input on fossil fuel drilling on federal lands

Another Trump administration payment to stop offshore wind farm

New Florida law bans local net-zero emissions policies

Are electric car batteries as dirty as critics claim?

Deal for Native American tribes’ rights to Colorado River water stalled by four states

Warming climate, pollution, and unplanned growth push Kashmir’s lakes toward disappearance

New laws force companies to confront most polluting plastics

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.