Republicans in Senate clash over how fast to cut clean energy tax breaks

Senate Republicans are divided over how quickly to roll back green energy tax credits enacted under President Biden, exposing internal party tensions as they push to finalize legislation by July 4.

Rachel Frazin reports for The Hill.


In short:

  • Sen. Josh Hawley is pushing to phase out renewable energy tax credits faster, arguing they waste money and represent liberal overreach, while other Republicans prefer a more measured rollback.
  • Some GOP senators, including Shelley Moore Capito and John Curtis, are calling for flexibility and targeted changes rather than a full repeal, with Capito seeking deadline extensions for hydrogen energy projects.
  • The Senate bill removes several aggressive restrictions included in the House version, creating friction with House conservatives who say the changes weaken efforts to eliminate subsidies.

Key quote:

“Funding the Green New Deal is like the least conservative thing I could think of to do.”

— Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo.

Why this matters:

The fight over clean energy tax credits isn’t just about fiscal policy — it’s about the future of U.S. climate and energy strategy. The credits in question have driven billions of dollars into wind, solar, hydrogen, and other low-carbon technologies. Rolling them back could slow the shift from fossil fuels, affecting pollution levels, grid stability, and energy costs. These debates also reveal deeper rifts in the Republican party over climate policy, especially as rural economies in red states increasingly benefit from renewable energy investments. Slashing incentives now could chill that momentum. Meanwhile, environmental and public health advocates warn that weakening support for clean energy increases greenhouse gas emissions, threatening air quality, climate resilience, and long-term public health.

Read more: Senate Republicans move to cut clean energy tax credits despite bipartisan benefits

A small house on the edge of the water with mountains in the background

Climate threats could cost Alaska billions. After October's storm, advocates say it’s time to act

Following a powerful storm that displaced entire Indigenous villages, advocates say Alaska must move beyond studies and reports to fund real protections against worsening climate threats.

Tropical forest with hills and fog in the background

COP30: Could Brazil’s ambitious new ‘Tropical Forests Forever’ fund help curb deforestation?

With over $5.5 billion in initial pledges and a goal of $125 billion, the Tropical Forests Forever Facility initiative aims to reshape global forest economics while drawing both praise and criticism.

An aerial view of wind turbines sited on green hills

2025 Elections: How rising energy costs are shaking up American politics

Across state races in New Jersey, Virginia, and Georgia, Democrats turned voter frustration over rising electricity prices into victories — reframing climate and energy policy as an issue of affordability.

A rocky island in the middle of the ocean viewed from above

The ocean has been hoarding heat. Now it is building up a massive 'burp'

Even if humans cut emissions enough to reduce global temperatures, new research shows the Southern Ocean could kick warming back into gear.
An orange-tinged sky and houses during a wildfire

Firefighters wear wristbands to track harmful exposures

As wildfires increasingly burn through urban areas, researchers are equipping firefighters with silicone wristbands to measure their exposure to hazardous chemicals released from burning buildings and vehicles.

Three Chinese scientists scrutinizing six test tubes of blue liquid

China is the new science power: how will Europe respond?

China is taking the lead in international science: A new study shows how China overtakes the US in key areas of research and increasingly dominates the agenda. What does this mean for Europe?
Scientist examines the result of a plaque assay, which is a test that allows scientists to count how many flu virus particles (virions) are in a mixture.
Credit: Photo by CDC on Unsplash

Insiders warn how dismantling federal agencies could put science at risk

From NASA to the National Institutes of Health, federal agencies conduct research that universities cannot. Agency scientists speak out about the irreplaceable facilities, institutional knowledge and training opportunities that the country is losing.
From our Newsroom
Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro speaks with the state flag and American flag behind him.

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

silhouette of people holding hands by a lake at sunset

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

wildfire retardants being sprayed by plane

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.

Stay informed: sign up for The Daily Climate newsletter
Top news on climate impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered to your inbox week days.