Saudi Arabia’s Neom project marketed as eco-friendly despite human rights and oil dependency concerns

Saudi Arabia’s Neom project, a purported eco-city, relies on Western PR firms to market sustainability claims that critics say mask human rights abuses and ongoing fossil fuel dependence.

Adam M. Lowenstein reports for DeSmog.

In short:

Western PR and consulting firms are profiting from contracts with Neom, promoting it as a model of sustainability despite Saudi Arabia’s major economic reliance on oil.
Neom’s construction displaces local tribes, with reports of forced evictions and severe legal repercussions for opposition, raising human rights concerns.
The Saudi government uses the Neom project to shape its global image as a green leader while obstructing climate action and increasing fossil fuel exports.

Key quote:

“Everyone [is] accepting Saudi money in exchange for silence.”

— Lina Alhathloul, head of monitoring and advocacy for ALQST for Human Rights

Why this matters:

Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest oil exporter, is using Neom’s green branding to deflect attention from its environmental and human rights issues. With billions invested in Neom’s image, the campaign underscores the growing influence of fossil-fuel-dependent states on global narratives about sustainability.

www.desmog.com

Saudi Arabia’s Neom project marketed as eco-friendly despite human rights and oil dependency concerns

Opinion: Virginia is making strides on clean energy – even as it falls behind

In Brazil, regenerative farming advances, but deforestation still pressures ecosystems

Can evolution keep up with climate change? A flower offers hope

Alabama House committee considers bills targeting solar farms

Is your state becoming uninsurable? We have the latest data

U.S. Interior Department bends on solar, but wind energy on public lands remains stalled

How Ann Arbor, Michigan, is creating its own clean energy utility

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.