States that shun Israeli firms risk losing FEMA disaster funds

Under new U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) rules quietly issued this summer, states and cities must certify they do not boycott Israeli companies before receiving disaster aid.

Maxine Joselow reports for The New York Times.

In short:

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) added an anti-boycott clause to all 2025 FEMA grant programs worth about $1.9 billion.
No state, and only a handful of cities, currently restrict contracts with Israeli businesses; DHS says none have lost money so far.
The requirement could complicate wildfire and hurricane preparations for places such as Richmond, California, which voted to divest from firms operating in Israel.

Why this matters:

Federal disaster assistance is becoming an ever larger lifeline as climate-fueled storms, floods, and fires chew through local budgets. Tying that money to foreign-policy litmus tests, even if only a handful of communities are affected, injects geopolitics into the nuts-and-bolts work of upgrading sirens, paying first responders and stockpiling water pumps. If a city’s ideological stance can stall rescue dollars today, future administrations could try using the same playbook on other hot-button issues, from reproductive health to fossil fuels. The precedent simultaneously tests free speech protections and the principle that aid should flow according to risk, not partisan loyalty.

www.nytimes.com

States that shun Israeli firms risk losing FEMA disaster funds

New Zealand’s climate ‘entering uncharted territory’ as greenhouse gases hit record highs

Solar power is helping the Global South skip fossil fuels

Utah needs a ‘Code Red’ policy to protect the homeless from extreme heat, report says

Colombia’s new government backs fracking as debate over energy future heats up

New documents add to evidence in climate deception case against ExxonMobil

Climate change and farming gave rise to ‘genetically distinct’ Beijing swan goose

Scientists who put faith in technology less likely to take climate action

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.