States that shun Israeli firms risk losing FEMA disaster funds

Under new U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) rules quietly issued this summer, states and cities must certify they do not boycott Israeli companies before receiving disaster aid.

Maxine Joselow reports for The New York Times.

In short:

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) added an anti-boycott clause to all 2025 FEMA grant programs worth about $1.9 billion.
No state, and only a handful of cities, currently restrict contracts with Israeli businesses; DHS says none have lost money so far.
The requirement could complicate wildfire and hurricane preparations for places such as Richmond, California, which voted to divest from firms operating in Israel.

Why this matters:

Federal disaster assistance is becoming an ever larger lifeline as climate-fueled storms, floods, and fires chew through local budgets. Tying that money to foreign-policy litmus tests, even if only a handful of communities are affected, injects geopolitics into the nuts-and-bolts work of upgrading sirens, paying first responders and stockpiling water pumps. If a city’s ideological stance can stall rescue dollars today, future administrations could try using the same playbook on other hot-button issues, from reproductive health to fossil fuels. The precedent simultaneously tests free speech protections and the principle that aid should flow according to risk, not partisan loyalty.

www.nytimes.com

States that shun Israeli firms risk losing FEMA disaster funds

Trump calls climate change a ‘con job’ as leaders of drowning nations watch at the UN

Extreme weather and extreme politics go hand in hand – Trump and Musk are pushing both

Cutting down the Amazon will bring extreme rain, wind and heat

The new nuclear fever, debunked

Nations deliver new climate targets ahead of climate summit

Plug-in solar bills are in the works in New Hampshire and Vermont

Clean energy, dirty tactics: Inside the shady world of door-to-door solar sales

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.