Supreme Court reviews Texas nuclear waste site dispute

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments on whether Texas can block a federal license for a temporary nuclear waste storage site, a case that could shape the future of spent fuel disposal in the U.S.

Dylan Baddour reports for Inside Climate News.

In short:

Texas and an oil company sued the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) over its approval of a site in West Texas to store up to 11 million pounds of spent uranium fuel.
A federal appeals court ruled in favor of Texas, arguing that U.S. law mandates on-site storage at reactors or a federal repository, not a private facility.
The Supreme Court will decide if the NRC has the authority to license private temporary storage and whether Texas had the right to sue.

Key quote:

“The likelihood of an interim site out there becoming the de facto permanent waste site is extremely high. That facility is not designed for that kind of storage."

— Tom “Smitty” Smith, former director of Public Citizen Texas

Why this matters:

As nuclear power gains traction as a low-carbon energy source, the United States remains without a long-term plan for handling the radioactive waste it produces. This gap in policy has left the nation relying on temporary storage solutions, which, over time, risk becoming permanent by default. One such site is in Texas, where a proposed interim storage facility has sparked environmental and safety concerns, particularly given the risks associated with transporting high-level nuclear waste across state lines.

The debate in Texas underscores the challenge facing policymakers nationwide: how to reconcile the benefits of nuclear energy with the unresolved problem of waste storage. Without a clear federal strategy, states may continue to resist shouldering the burden, leaving the nation in limbo as its stockpile of dangerous radioactive waste grows.

insideclimatenews.org

Credit: Jesse Schoff/Unsplash

A new wildlife assessment shows alarming declines and a few bright spots

An update to the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List, the global scientific authority on the status of species, underscores the immense challenges facing species in a world transformed by humans but also offer exciting new evidence of how the right interventions can help them survive.

Read the Full Article on

www.nytimes.com

Supreme Court reviews Texas nuclear waste site dispute

Researchers are reanimating 40,000-year-old microbes

A new wildlife assessment shows alarming declines and a few bright spots

'Not up for discussion': Brussels rejects Washington's pressure on climate rules

Senate nixes management plans to open access for fossil fuels

Inside Trump’s foray into mineral ownership

The hidden cost of ultra-processed foods on the environment: ‘The whole industry should pay’

This data scientist sees progress in the climate change fight

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.