supreme court climate change

Op-ed: Reflections on the Supreme Court’s Decision in West Virginia v. EPA

Danger resides in the majority’s having invoked a sweeping “Major Questions Doctrine” to justify its decision in this relatively narrow case.

The recent 6-3 U.S. Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. EPA was an exercise of raw political power.

The anti-regulation, conservative majority did it with a highly contrived, legally threadbare argument simply because they could. Notably, the dispute was about a regulation — the Clean Power Plan (CPP) — that was no longer in effect.

It’s also worth noting that market forces had already done more to drive a transition away from coal in U.S. electricity generation than the CPP had been predicted to do, had it stayed in force.

The only apparent reasons for the Supreme Court to take the case were (1) to allow the Court’s most radical majority in modern times to reduce the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority to address climate change, and (2) to do so in a way that would open the door to future decisions reining in the power of the so-called “administrative state” to regulate industry under broad guidelines granted by the Congress.

Depriving the agency of an important option 

What the decision explicitly forbids EPA to do is to use “generation-shifting mechanisms”— that is, forcing electricity generators to shift to cleaner options -- to reduce the reliance of U.S. electricity generation on coal-fired power plants.

The ruling does not deprive EPA of the right to regulate coal-fired power plant emissions in other ways, such as with emission standards or technology requirements applied to specified types of plants. (One could assume the Court only left those options open to EPA because it was only the generation shifting options that had been challenged in the case the Court was reviewing.)

The Court’s majority claims it is simply returning to Congress the opportunity to indicate whether or not it intended to delegate to EPA authority to do the specific thing that the disputed regulation did; but the majority is well aware there’s no chance the current Congress would come down in favor.

While the ruling does, then, deprive EPA of one important option for regulating greenhouse-gas emission, the far larger danger resides in the majority’s having invoked a sweeping “Major Questions Doctrine” to justify its decision in this relatively narrow case.

Dangerous doctrine 

That majority declared that this newly labeled doctrine — whose antecedents in previous Court decisions do not fit the current case (see Justice Kagan’s dissent)― holds that rules imposed by EPA or other Executive Branch agencies are subject to judicial review if the rules have major economic or other societal impacts and were not authorized, explicitly and in detail, in the language of Congress’s delegation of authority to the agency in question.

Inasmuch as Congressional delegations of regulatory authority to Executive Branch agencies often do not specify the specific regulatory tools the agencies may use (for the good reason that Congress lacks the relevant expertise and doesn’t wish to constrain those better equipped), the majority’s newly elevated doctrine puts a vast array of environmental and business regulations at risk when this Court finds opportunities to review them.

John Holdren is a research professor in Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government and Co-Director of the Science, Technology, and Public Policy Program in the School’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.

From January 2009 to January 2017, Holdren was President Obama’s Science Advisor and Senate-confirmed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy

Hands on keyboard of black laptop computer with data graphs on the screen.

Environmental groups sue Trump administration over shutdown of climate and pollution data tools

The Biden-era online tools used to identify pollution and climate risks in vulnerable communities were removed without explanation, prompting a federal lawsuit by environmental and advocacy organizations.

Georgina Gustin reports for Inside Climate News.

Keep reading...Show less
Sunrise in the woods

Get our Good News newsletter

Get the best positive, solutions-oriented stories we've seen on the intersection of our health and environment, FREE every Tuesday in your inbox. Subscribe here today. Keep the change tomorrow.

Image of tall buildings reaching towards a blue sky.

Banks revise climate goals as shift toward net-zero stalls globally

The world’s largest climate-focused banking coalition has voted to weaken its emissions targets, loosening rules to accommodate the sluggish pace of economic and policy change since 2021.

Virginia Furness reports for Reuters.

Keep reading...Show less
Image showing a destroyed road heading towards a dark city.

Trump accelerates federal deregulation campaign

President Trump’s administration is launching a rapid, far-reaching rollback of federal regulations across health, labor, environmental, and consumer safety sectors, using legal shortcuts and a new agency led by Elon Musk.

Coral Davenport reports for The New York Times.

Keep reading...Show less
Nasa sign in front of white building.

Push to privatize NASA and NOAA climate research sparks backlash from Maryland lawmakers

The Trump administration’s proposed budget would slash funding for NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) science programs and shift long-term climate research toward private companies, drawing sharp criticism from Maryland’s congressional delegation.

Marianne Lavelle reports for Inside Climate News.

Keep reading...Show less
Woman holding a pink letter with the words Layoff Notice printed in large letters.

Massive federal job cuts threaten key energy and climate programs

A wave of federal agency layoffs expected under President Trump is drawing opposition from energy experts and former officials who warn the cuts will weaken U.S. energy infrastructure and public health protections.

Lisa Friedman reports for The New York Times.

Keep reading...Show less
View of a landing strip from the cockpit of an airplane.

Zeldin tours the U.S. to promote EPA partnerships as deep cuts loom

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin is traveling the country promoting federal collaboration with states and industry, even as he moves to slash the agency’s budget and roll back regulations.

Miranda Willson reports for E&E News.

Keep reading...Show less
Valencia Spain roundabout with park and buildings in the background.
Credit: ebroslu/Pixabay

Europe saw deadly floods, heatwaves, and record losses as climate risks intensified in 2024

Record-breaking heat, catastrophic flooding, and massive economic losses made 2024 one of the most damaging years yet for Europe as the continent warmed at twice the global rate.

Rosie Frost reports for Euronews.

Keep reading...Show less
From our Newsroom
Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro speaks with the state flag and American flag behind him.

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

silhouette of people holding hands by a lake at sunset

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

wildfire retardants being sprayed by plane

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.

People  sitting in an outdoors table working on a big sign.

Op-ed: Why funding for the environmental justice movement must be anti-racist

We must prioritize minority-serving institutions, BIPOC-led organizations and researchers to lead environmental justice efforts.

joe biden

Biden finalizes long-awaited hydrogen tax credits ahead of Trump presidency

Responses to the new rules have been mixed, and environmental advocates worry that Trump could undermine them.

Op-ed: Toxic prisons teach us that environmental justice needs abolition

Op-ed: Toxic prisons teach us that environmental justice needs abolition

Prisons, jails and detention centers are placed in locations where environmental hazards such as toxic landfills, floods and extreme heat are the norm.

Stay informed: sign up for The Daily Climate newsletter
Top news on climate impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered to your inbox week days.