wildfire
People should take wildfire smoke more seriously
Research shows wildfire smoke is a major health hazard, but many Americans continue to disregard the risks.
In short:
- Wildfire smoke contains tiny particles that pose serious health risks and kill thousands annually.
- Recent studies show almost all of North America has experienced smoke coverage at some point in recent years.
- Despite the dangers, public awareness and protective actions, such as mask-wearing, remain insufficient.
Key quote:
“There’s a lot of chemicals in that. There’s all sorts of things in the pollution that you might not see in other sources of PM2.5. We’re still unclear on what that means for health.”
— Marissa Childs, an environmental-health researcher at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health
Why this matters:
Research indicates that wildfire smoke contains a hazardous mix of particulate matter, gases, and chemicals that can penetrate deep into the lungs and bloodstream. These tiny particles, known as PM2.5, are particularly concerning due to their ability to trigger respiratory and cardiovascular problems. For vulnerable populations—children, the elderly, and those with pre-existing conditions like asthma or heart disease—the risks are even higher.
Related EHN coverage:
Maui residents struggle with health issues months after devastating fires
Months following the catastrophic fire in Lahaina, Maui, residents are facing serious health complications, including respiratory problems and psychological distress, while grappling with inadequate medical resources.
In short:
- The Maui Wildfire Exposure Study reveals a strong correlation between exposure to fire debris and adverse health outcomes.
- Local health services are overwhelmed, with significant increases in reported cases of depression and anxiety among the affected residents.
- Access to healthcare has deteriorated, impacting particularly Native Hawaiians and other minority communities in the region.
Key quote:
"You can see it in the data. We are capturing a broad insight into exposures and issues that no one has done before."
— Ruben Juarez, professor of health economics
Why this matters:
These struggles are a reminder of the long-term health consequences that can follow natural disasters, especially in areas not sufficiently equipped to handle their immediate impacts or their lingering aftermath.
Related EHN coverage:
Lahaina's wildfire aftermath reveals unexpected low toxicity levels
The fierce heat of the Lahaina wildfire may have played a pivotal role in diminishing the presence of toxic contaminants typically associated with such disasters.
In short:
- Renee Takesue's research shows early signs that the intense heat of Lahaina's wildfire may have neutralized many harmful chemicals.
- Investigations continue as Takesue samples soil and water across 38 sites to gauge environmental impacts and guide recovery.
- State officials have declared coastal waters safe for recreation, citing minimal contamination from the fire.
Key quote:
“What happens is that the chemicals either totally volatilize and get transported through the atmosphere or they get destroyed because the temperature is so high.”
— Renee Takesue, USGS scientist
Why this matters:
While these fires have left behind charred landscapes and displaced communities, they have also catalyzed the breakdown of certain pollutants present in the environment.
Related: As western wildfires become bigger and more intense, state and federal fire agencies are using more and more aerial fire retardant, prompting concerns over fish kills, aquatic life, and water quality.
New perspectives on wildfire management from recent Canadian wildfires
As wildfires grow fiercer and more unpredictable across Canada, officials and communities are urgently revising their emergency response strategies to adapt to this escalating threat.
In short:
- Officials in Yellowknife learned valuable lessons from the rapid spread of the SS052 fire, which destroyed the town of Enterprise, N.W.T., demonstrating the ferocity of new wildfire patterns.
- Evacuations are increasingly seen as essential, as traditional firefighting methods reach their limits in mitigating the spread and impact of severe wildfires.
- Communication and preparedness are pivotal, with improvements needed in public information systems to ensure timely updates during emergencies.
Key quote:
"We are seeing a very clear trend and events like these are happening more frequently. They’re bigger in nature, and they’re lasting longer than they ever have before."
— Coby Duerr, commander of Canada Task Force 2
Why this matters:
In the face of increasing and more intense wildfires, communities see the need to invest in robust evacuation plans that are regularly updated and communicated effectively to residents. This includes identifying evacuation routes, establishing evacuation centers, and ensuring that vulnerable populations, such as the elderly and those with disabilities, have the support they need to evacuate safely.
Even when we cannot keep our infrastructure standing, we can stop people dying, we can protect our most valuable possessions, and we can learn to deal with devastation.
Prescribed burns help halt major wildfire in Texas Panhandle
In Borger, Texas, a strategic prescribed burn effectively prevented a major wildfire from damaging local neighborhoods, showcasing its potential as a fire management tool despite some opposition.
In short:
- A seven-mile prescribed burn in Borger, Texas, created a barrier that stopped the Windy Deuce fire, saving homes and potentially lives.
- Despite its proven effectiveness, the practice of prescribed burning faces skepticism and legal hesitations among private landowners.
- The region's increasing wildfire risk due to climate change emphasizes the need for effective fire management strategies like prescribed burns.
Key quote:
"I would bet my next paycheck, if that black line had not been there, we would have lost homes and, it’s quite possible, lives. There’s no doubt in my mind."
— Archie Stone, wildland fire coordinator for Borger
Why this matters:
Prescribed burns have gained traction as an effective wildfire prevention tool, particularly in regions prone to wildfires. By harnessing the power of controlled fire, land managers can proactively safeguard both natural landscapes and human communities from the devastating impacts of uncontrolled wildfires.
Hands on the land, heart in community: Returning cultural fires.
Facing a wildfire crisis with underpaid heroes
U.S. wildland firefighters face dire circumstances, enduring unlivable wages and dangerous conditions while protecting the nation from wildfires.
In short:
- Wildland firefighters in the U.S., numbering around 19,000, grapple with salaries below a livable wage, homelessness, and PTSD due to the perilous nature of their work.
- The climate crisis exacerbates the challenges, with larger and unpredictable fires occurring year-round, putting additional strain on an already overburdened workforce.
- Efforts to improve conditions, including a pay raise in 2022, have been insufficient, and the profession faces a high turnover rate, endangering the effectiveness of wildfire response.
Key quote:
“This is a group of people who truly love what they do. It’s not just a job, it becomes so much a part of your life.”
— Riva Duncan, vice president of Grassroots Wildland Firefighters
Why this matters:
Wildland firefighters carry heavy equipment over rugged terrain, work long shifts—sometimes up to 16 hours a day for consecutive days—and operate in environments that can range from freezing cold to oppressively hot. This relentless physical exertion can lead to injuries and long-term health issues.
The exposure to smoke and particulate matter poses a serious health risk. Prolonged inhalation of these substances can affect lung function and exacerbate or lead to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Despite protective gear, the nature of the work often exposes firefighters to harmful levels of smoke.
As western wildfires become bigger and more intense, state and federal fire agencies are using more and more aerial fire retardant, prompting concerns over fish kills, aquatic life, and water quality.
Opinion: Climate risks to nuclear sites escalate with changing weather patterns
In an era of escalating climate threats, nuclear facilities face unprecedented challenges.
In short:
- Climate change exacerbates the risk of wildfires and other natural disasters near nuclear sites, raising concerns about safety.
- Recent close calls at facilities like the Pantex Plant in Texas highlight the urgent need for better preparedness against natural disasters.
- Nuclear power plants and weapon complexes are increasingly vulnerable, with most U.S. plants unprepared for climate-induced disasters.
Key quote:
"We need to see more nuclear facilities developing resiliency mechanisms. Not just because of wildfires. We are entering an era where rapidly evolving risks are impacting nuclear operations."
— Nickolas Roth, senior director of nuclear materials security at the Nuclear Threat Initiative
Why this matters:
Nuclear facilities face escalating risks from climate change, including flooding, heatwaves, drought, and wildfires, which threaten their safety and efficiency.
Be sure to read: Disasters are not natural. We—humanity and society—create them and we can choose to prevent them.