Texas' stance against 'anti-fossil fuel' banks may cost billions in taxpayer dollars

In a bold move against banks deemed unfriendly to fossil fuels, Texas's actions could lead to a staggering $22 billion in additional taxpayer costs.

Chris Tomlinson reports for The Houston Chronicle.

In short:

Texas has blacklisted financial institutions that limit dealings with fossil fuel companies, impacting major banks like UBS.
The state's stance led to legal disputes and financial penalties, including an $850,000 settlement with UBS.
Economists predict this policy could result in Texas taxpayers facing up to $22.5 billion in extra interest payments over 30 years.

Key quote:

“If you're going to be anti-fossil fuels, if you're going to demand certain policies before you loan companies money, then we're not going to do business with you. That's a policy that we took to protect our oil and gas industry."

— Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick

Why this matters:

Texas's aggressive stance against 'anti-fossil fuel' banks highlights the complex interplay between environmental policies and economic repercussions. This stance could burden taxpayers with billions in extra costs, raising questions about the balance between environmental advocacy and fiscal responsibility.

Major pipelines hit legal snags. But it’s business as usual in Texas.

www.houstonchronicle.com

Texas' stance against 'anti-fossil fuel' banks may cost billions in taxpayer dollars

Clothes that cool you, warm you — and make power as you move

Gas from thawing Arctic permafrost is changing world's climate future

‘Explosion of melt rates’: 20% of Swiss glaciers lost in five years

Climate change’s compounding pressures on rural North Carolina

The true cost of Trump's fuel economy rollbacks

Montana officials praise repeal of power plant emission regulations, watchdog groups pan decision

The surprising allies backing Boulder's climate case before the Supreme Court

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.