Industry and consumers push back against moves to dismantle Energy Star program

Decades after launching one of the federal government’s most widely used energy-efficiency programs, the Trump administration is now seeking to eliminate Energy Star as part of a broader rollback of environmental protections.

Elizabeth Kolbert reports for The New Yorker.


In short:

  • The Energy Star program, established in 1992 and credited with major energy savings and emissions reductions, is reportedly on the chopping block under the Trump administration’s restructuring plans for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
  • The proposal has prompted widespread pushback from businesses, cities, and lawmakers, with over a thousand groups urging continued funding, citing the program’s low cost and large financial benefits to households.
  • The move is part of a broader federal effort to dismantle climate-related policies, including lawsuits against states with local climate initiatives and cuts to scientific climate programs and databases.

Key quote:

“I think what we’re seeing is they’re going after programs because they’re popular. They’re going after programs because people will notice, because they are in the process of repudiating the social contract.”

— Joe Goffman, former head of the EPA's Office of Air and Radiation under Joe Biden

Why this matters:

Energy Star is a voluntary labeling system that helps consumers identify energy-efficient products, from refrigerators to water heaters. Its blue label is one of the few widely recognized government signals in the marketplace, guiding millions of purchases and encouraging manufacturers to exceed minimum efficiency standards. Killing the program undermines an initiative that slashes electricity use and carbon emissions with minimal taxpayer investment.

Read more: Energy Star program faces shutdown as EPA reorganizes under Trump administration

Panel of climate scientists onstage at COP25 Q & A
Photo credit: World Meteorological Organization, https://www.flickr.com/photos/worldmeteorologicalorganization/

What top climate scientists think of Trump’s treaty withdrawals

Though the abandonment of international agreements is “a damn shame,” they say science will prevail.
Coastal village in Greenland with multicolored homes and ice floes in the background

As Trump eyes Greenland, what could that mean for island’s mineral wealth and environment?

The Danish territory holds significant stores of oil, gas and minerals. But regulations and the extreme environment have kept the vast majority in the ground.
participants at the entrance to COP 30 pavilion
Credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/isostandards/ Creative Commons: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/

The impact of US withdrawal from global climate pacts

The US has pledged to pull out of dozens of international organizations and treaties established to advance the protection of the planet. But it doesn't spell the end of environmental action.
flags on green grass field near brown concrete building during daytime

US exit of key UN climate treaty criticized as self-sabotage

The United States' decision to withdraw from the United Nations' key climate treaty is a "colossal own goal" that will harm the U.S. economy, jobs and living standards, United Nations climate chief Simon Stiell says.

A refinery with lots of smokestacks and industrial equipment

US oil companies will be slow to answer Trump’s call to tap into Venezuela, experts say

President Donald Trump is unlikely to see many U.S. oil companies jump in response to his call to tap into Venezuela, industry experts say.
Boat on the ocean highlighted against an orange, burning sun
Photo Credit: Photo by Samuel Arkwright on Unsplash

‘Profound impacts’: Record ocean heat is intensifying climate disasters, data shows

Oceans absorb 90% of global heating, making them a stark indicator of the relentless march of the climate crisis.

a large fire burning in a field next to a forest

Opinion: Climate misinformation threatens Canada’s national security

With Canada's wildfire season only months away, the time to combat climate misinformation is now, before the next crisis exposes the weaknesses in our systems.

From our Newsroom
Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro speaks with the state flag and American flag behind him.

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

silhouette of people holding hands by a lake at sunset

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

wildfire retardants being sprayed by plane

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.

Stay informed: sign up for The Daily Climate newsletter
Top news on climate impacts, solutions, politics, drivers. Delivered to your inbox week days.