Trump budget plan threatens NASA and NOAA climate programs with severe funding cuts

A sweeping White House proposal would slash science budgets at NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, dismantling key climate research efforts and prompting warnings from former agency officials about national security and economic risks.

Gabrielle Canon reports for The Guardian.

In short:

Internal budget documents reveal plans to cut NOAA's climate research funding from $485 million to $171 million, effectively eliminating its oceanic and atmospheric research division.
NASA would lose 20% of its overall funding, with deep reductions to planetary science and the cancellation of major missions, including the Nancy Grace Roman space telescope and Mars Sample Return.
The proposed cuts also target the National Marine Fisheries Service and other climate-related programs, redirecting priorities to align with expanding fossil fuel energy development.

Key quote:

“This proposal will cost lives. When a room full of doctors tell you that it’s cancer, firing the doctors does not cure you.”

— Craig McLean, former director of NOAA's office of oceanic and atmospheric research

Why this matters:

Research funded by NASA and NOAA doesn’t just drive scientific discovery — it supports public health, food security, disaster preparedness, and global diplomacy. NOAA's ocean, weather, and climate data help communities brace for hurricanes, droughts, and flooding. NASA's Earth-observing satellites track everything from wildfires to shrinking ice caps. Gutting these programs risks making the U.S. blind to fast-moving environmental threats and vulnerable to crises that science could otherwise help predict or mitigate. While Congress has the final say, the proposed budget is a clear signal of political hostility toward climate science. If enacted, the consequences could ripple through sectors as diverse as agriculture, insurance, emergency management, and even national defense, where accurate environmental forecasting is critical.

www.theguardian.com

Trump budget plan threatens NASA and NOAA climate programs with severe funding cuts

EPA plan could strip authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from factory farms

Fracking lawsuit in West Virginia alleges toxic exposure sickened children

Trump administration moves to replace senior official at global energy agency

Plastic treaty talks face mounting industry influence as nations split on production cuts

EU’s plan to buy foreign carbon cuts moves forward without impact study

Trump energy chief’s review of climate reports sparks backlash from scientists

DHS reassigns FEMA workers to immigration hiring push as hurricane season peaks

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.