Trump moves to boost coal power despite industry decline
President Trump announced plans to expand coal energy production, though it remains unclear what specific actions his administration will take.
Rachel Frazin reports for The Hill.
In short:
- Trump posted on social media that he is “authorizing” increased coal energy production, though the legal basis for this is unclear.
- His administration is considering using emergency powers to stop coal plant closures, with top officials working on a broader plan.
- The Interior Department recently approved a major coal mine expansion, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is expected to roll back regulations on coal plant emissions.
Key quote:
“Donald Trump is not concerned with Americans’ health or economic well-being. He is only concerned with helping out his billionaire buddies in the fossil fuel industry.”
— Patrick Drupp, director of climate policy at the Sierra Club
Why this matters:
Coal is among the dirtiest fossil fuels, producing more carbon emissions per unit of energy than oil or gas. In recent years, the decline of coal in the U.S. has been largely driven by market forces — natural gas, made cheaper by the fracking boom, has undercut coal in cost, while wind and solar power have gained ground due to falling prices and government incentives.
The Trump administration’s push to support the coal industry, however, could disrupt this transition. Policies aimed at rolling back environmental regulations and propping up coal-fired power plants may slow the country’s shift away from fossil fuels. But even with government support, coal faces headwinds. Many utilities have already moved toward cleaner energy sources, citing both economic and environmental concerns.
Beyond economics, the environmental and health impacts of coal remain significant. Coal mining and combustion release pollutants that contribute to respiratory illnesses, heart disease, and other health issues. Burning coal also produces carbon dioxide, a major driver of climate change. The administration’s approach to coal policy will have lasting implications—not just for energy markets, but for air quality, public health, and efforts to combat climate change.
Related EHN coverage: Want healthier babies? Shut down coal plants
