Trump's climate stance alarms scientists as second term looms

Scientists at the American Geophysical Union conference fear threats to climate research under a second Trump presidency, including censorship, funding cuts agency upheavals.

Zack Colman and Chelsea Harvey report for POLITICO.

In short:

Researchers worry Trump’s return could mean dismantling or weakening federal climate programs.
Project 2025, a conservative blueprint, proposes deep budget cuts and reorganizations of agencies like NOAA and EPA.
Many anticipate censorship of climate-related terms, potential layoffs shifts in scientific priorities.

Key quote:

“There are definitely going to be some bad things happening for science policy, science workers, the scientific enterprise at large.”

— Caitlin Bergstrom, the American Geophysical Union’s program manager for science policy and government relations

Why this matters:

Federal climate research informs policies protecting public health and the environment. Disruptions could hinder our understanding of climate change and slow efforts to mitigate its impacts. A rollback in funding or suppression of data could leave communities unprepared for accelerating climate threats.

www.politico.com

Trump's climate stance alarms scientists as second term looms

'Why would we want to leave?': Fiji islanders work on climate resilience to avoid relocation

How a U.N. report legitimized carbon capture and skewed decades of climate policy

What is Canada’s climate track record as it seeks 'ever closer' ties with Europe?

Opinion: Will it be AI or the climate crisis that ends humanity? We can make it neither

The slow, surprising death of EV range anxiety

As permitting bill debate approaches, Senators have fresh doubts and an ultimatum

El Niño-driven drought in Papua New Guinea a ‘national crisis’ as rivers dry up and local farms fail

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.