Nuclear power plant emitting steam from cooling towers.

Trump's push to expand nuclear power challenges regulator's independence

President Trump’s executive orders demanding a major nuclear expansion set the stage for a confrontation over the authority of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), a body long regarded as a neutral arbiter of nuclear safety.

Peter Behr reports for E&E News.

In short:

Trump’s executive orders direct the NRC to overhaul safety regulations and accelerate reactor approvals, while involving other agencies like the Department of Energy and Department of Defense in reactor vetting and construction.
Critics, including former NRC chairs and nuclear experts, warn that diminishing the agency’s independence could erode public trust and compromise nuclear safety oversight.
Advanced nuclear technologies, many using untested fuels and cooling systems, pose unique risks that experts say require rigorous, independent review rather than expedited approval.

Key quote:

“Maintaining independent, effective regulation is essential to avoid serious consequences.”

— Amir Afzali, retired utility senior director with decades of experience in nuclear power

Why this matters:

On one hand, nuclear power offers a carbon-free alternative to fossil fuels at a time of soaring electricity demand driven by AI data centers, electrification, and climate targets. On the other, its history is riddled with expensive delays, safety controversies, and deep public skepticism. The Trump administration’s push to weaken the independence of the NRC — a regulator created to ensure public health and safety — rekindles old concerns about promoting nuclear energy at the expense of oversight. Unlike renewables, nuclear power carries catastrophic risk if mishandled. And the new reactor designs being championed come with unfamiliar engineering challenges, such as sodium-cooled systems that can ignite on contact with air. Experts caution that sidelining NRC’s safety process could increase the chances of error, and by involving politically appointed officials in what were once technical decisions, the administration may blur the lines between innovation and accountability.

www.eenews.net

Trump's push to expand nuclear power challenges regulator's independence

Geothermal energy fuels Colorado greenhouses that grow food through winter

How Boston is preparing for its watery future — and not waiting on Washington

Groundwater overuse is drying the planet and raising the seas

Trump reshapes public land policy to favor industry over conservation

Copenhagen turns to creative green engineering to outsmart future floods

Trump-era climate report ignores science to boost fossil fuel agenda

America’s scientific dominance is crumbling from within

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.