US Supreme Court clears way for climate lawsuits against Big Oil

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear a challenge from Republican-led states that sought to block lawsuits holding fossil fuel companies accountable for their role in climate change.

Austyn Gaffney reports for The New York Times.

In short:

The court’s decision allows lawsuits from Democratic-led states — such as California, Connecticut, and Minnesota — to move forward against oil giants like Exxon Mobil and BP for allegedly misleading the public about climate change.
Nineteen Republican attorneys general attempted to shut down these cases, arguing they could disrupt interstate commerce, but the Supreme Court refused to intervene.
The ruling is the latest signal that courts are willing to let states hold fossil fuel companies financially responsible for their greenhouse gas emissions.

Key quote:

“This was never anything more than an attempt to run interference, help the defendants in our cases avoid accountability, and play politics with the Constitution.”

— Keith Ellison, Minnesota attorney general

Why this matters:

This decision opens the door for states to press forward with lawsuits that could force oil companies to pay for climate damages, potentially setting a precedent for holding polluters accountable.

www.nytimes.com

US Supreme Court clears way for climate lawsuits against Big Oil

Climate-resilient housing models slow to gain ground in disaster-prone Bangladesh

The battle over solar on farmland

4 ways Trump is sabotaging climate action around the world

Even low-risk homes are caught up in California’s climate insurance crisis

Iran war should trigger faster exit from fossil fuel dependence, UN climate chief says

'Doomsday Clock' advances to 85 seconds to midnight

The latest front in the battle over climate lawsuits: bills wiping out liability

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.