Virginia Democrats push to rejoin carbon market as Youngkin seeks disaster relief fund

Virginia Democrats are trying to restore the state’s membership in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI), while Gov. Glenn Youngkin wants to use RGGI funds for permanent disaster relief instead of climate-related resilience and energy conservation programs.

Charles Paullin reports for Inside Climate News.

In short:

Virginia’s Democratic-controlled House and Senate want to rejoin RGGI, arguing that Youngkin’s withdrawal is costing the state millions. The decision remains tied up in court.
Youngkin proposes using the $102 million from RGGI’s December auction to create a disaster relief fund, a move critics say violates state law requiring RGGI funds to go toward flood preparedness and energy efficiency.
Senate Democrats suggest redirecting $97 million to the general fund, with $50 million for flood relief, $25 million for Hurricane Helene victims and $25 million for future disaster mitigation.

Key quote:

“Youngkin and Miyares have been shown for the third or fourth time now they were wrong on the law. Every month we’re not a part of RGGI we’re losing out on tens of millions of dollars, while climate change continues to wreak devastation on our Commonwealth.”

— Virginia State Senate Majority Leader Scott Surovell (D-Fairfax)

Why this matters:

Virginia is at the forefront of a growing crisis as rising sea levels and worsening floods threaten coastal communities. The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a multi-state cap-and-trade program, has provided crucial funding for flood resilience and energy efficiency projects. But a proposal by Governor Glenn Youngkin to withdraw from the program has sparked debate over how the state should prepare for climate-driven disasters. Youngkin argues that the RGGI functions as a tax on ratepayers without delivering meaningful environmental benefits. Supporters, however, say the program generates millions in revenue that helps local governments fortify communities against the impacts of climate change.

insideclimatenews.org

Credit: Hubert Neufeld/Unsplash

Black carbon spewing from ships is a major climate threat in the Arctic

A coalition of nations and environmental groups is lobbying the International Maritime Organization to create regulations around black carbon, or soot, that spews from ships and blankets parts of glaciers and snow.

Read the Full Article on

apnews.com

Virginia Democrats push to rejoin carbon market as Youngkin seeks disaster relief fund

Opinion: Artificial intelligence can spur chemical plant decarbonization

Clear Horizons Act, setting emissions goals, heads to New Mexico Senate floor

Black carbon spewing from ships is a major climate threat in the Arctic

What over a century of ice data can tell us about the Great Lakes' future

Fracking boom put oil field in Texas river’s floodplain

Encouragement boosts people’s likelihood to take climate action

Energy Star program survives Trump administration's budget cuts

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.