Street signs with the words Wall St on them and tall buildings in background.

Wall Street investors profit from lawsuits against green policies

Financial speculators are pouring money into lawsuits against governments over environmental regulations, with fossil fuel and mining firms securing billions in public funds through international arbitration.

Patrick Greenfield and Phoebe Weston report for The Guardian.

In short:

Corporations use investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) to sue governments over policies that affect their profits, with awards now averaging over $200 million per case.
Hedge funds and litigation financiers increasingly fund these lawsuits, taking a share of settlements, often targeting developing nations.
Fossil fuel and mining firms have won at least $92 billion from governments, with many awards undisclosed, making the total likely much higher.

Key quote:

“The creation of a ‘gambler’s Nirvana’ by allowing third-party funders to use investor-state dispute settlements as a means of financial speculation, without any possibility of making costs awards against those funders, is deeply problematic.”

— Kamal Hossain, ISDS arbitrator

Why this matters:

A complex web of legal mechanisms allows corporations, particularly in the fossil fuel and mining industries, to challenge government policies designed to protect public health and the environment. These legal challenges often take place through investor-state dispute settlement systems, which permit companies to sue governments for policies they claim harm their investments. The result can be staggering financial penalties, sometimes reaching into the billions, which are ultimately shouldered by taxpayers.

This trend is especially concerning in developing nations, where the financial burden of these legal battles can stifle environmental protections and deepen economic inequalities. The involvement of litigation financiers — who fund lawsuits in exchange for a share of the settlement — adds another layer of controversy, turning legal disputes into high-stakes investment opportunities.

www.theguardian.com

Wall Street investors profit from lawsuits against green policies

EPA shifts scientists from research to chemical approvals, raising alarm over independence

Hawaii moves to sue Big Oil over climate costs; Trump administration strikes first

How fragile power grids and extreme weather combined to cause Europe’s biggest blackout in decades

Most North American bird species are declining as once-safe habitats falter

Trump accelerates environmental rollbacks at unprecedented pace in first 100 days

Trump administration moves to eliminate $2.4 billion in environmental justice grants

Canada’s new prime minister backs fossil fuels while promising Indigenous partnerships

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.

Op-ed: Why funding for the environmental justice movement must be anti-racist

We must prioritize minority-serving institutions, BIPOC-led organizations and researchers to lead environmental justice efforts.