Washington enacts an ambitious carbon emissions strategy

Exploring Washington's new cap-and-trade program reveals complexity and contention.

Natalia Mesa reports for High Country News.

In short:

Washington's cap-and-trade policy is designed to decrease greenhouse gas emissions over time, touted as the strongest in the U.S.
Critiques arise around the efficacy of cap-and-trade and its impact on disadvantaged communities.
Despite the goal of reducing emissions to 95% below 1990 levels by 2050, concerns linger about the actual environmental and economic outcomes.

Key quote:

"We still haven’t seen a good answer for how linkage would actually lead to reduced levels of greenhouse gas emissions."

— Nico Wedekind, public interest environmental attorney at Front and Centered

Why this matters:

The potential of Washington's cap-and-trade program lies in its dual promise: reducing greenhouse gas emissions to combat climate change while fostering economic growth through green innovation and jobs. Critics, however, raise concerns about the program's effectiveness and fairness.

How joining a climate program could save Western Pennsylvania kids’ lives and lungs.

www.hcn.org

Credit: Hubert Neufeld/Unsplash

Black carbon spewing from ships is a major climate threat in the Arctic

A coalition of nations and environmental groups is lobbying the International Maritime Organization to create regulations around black carbon, or soot, that spews from ships and blankets parts of glaciers and snow.

Read the Full Article on

apnews.com

Washington enacts an ambitious carbon emissions strategy

Opinion: Artificial intelligence can spur chemical plant decarbonization

Clear Horizons Act, setting emissions goals, heads to New Mexico Senate floor

Black carbon spewing from ships is a major climate threat in the Arctic

What over a century of ice data can tell us about the Great Lakes' future

Fracking boom put oil field in Texas river’s floodplain

Encouragement boosts people’s likelihood to take climate action

Energy Star program survives Trump administration's budget cuts

Multiple Houston-area oil and gas facilities that have violated pollution laws are seeking permit renewals

One facility has emitted cancer-causing chemicals into waterways at levels up to 520% higher than legal limits.

Pennsylvania health advocates say Trump’s first 100 days in office have caused “100 harms” to local communities

“They're terrorizing these scientists because they want to keep them silent.”

Regulators are underestimating health impacts from air pollution: Study

"The reality is, we are not exposed to one chemical at a time.”

Two years into his term, has Gov. Shapiro kept his promises to regulate Pennsylvania’s fracking industry?

A new report assesses the administration’s progress and makes new recommendations

An open letter from EPA staff to the American public

“We cannot stand by and allow this to happen. We need to hold this administration accountable.”

New evidence links heavy metal pollution with wildfire retardants

“The chemical black box” that blankets wildfire-impacted areas is increasingly under scrutiny.